Accuracy of Trephination-based Versus Drilling-based Guided Dental Implant Placement
- Conditions
- Partially Edentulous MaxillaSingle Tooth Lost
- Interventions
- Procedure: guided trephination-based drilling protocolProcedure: guided Conventional drilling-based protocol
- Registration Number
- NCT05295082
- Lead Sponsor
- Mohammed Ramadan
- Brief Summary
This study will be initiated to compare the accuracy of implant placement using the guided trephination drilling protocol and the guided conventional drilling protocol.
- Detailed Description
This study will be conducted to compare the accuracy of implant placement using the guided trephination drilling protocol and the guided conventional drilling protocol.
the patients with a single missing tooth will be assigned to one group ( trephination drilling / conventional drilling ).the preoperative virtual planning and fabrication of a surgical guide will be made for each patient. after implant placement according to each group, postoperative (CBCT ) will be performed to compare the virtual implant position and the actual implant position.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 22
- Single missing maxillary premolar or molar tooth.
- Both genders aged from 20-50 years.
- Patients should be systematically free from any disease as according to Cornell Medical Index-Health Questionnaire. (Pendleton et al,.2004)
- Mesio-distal space ≥ 7 mm.
- Bone width in bucco-lingual direction ≥ 6 mm.
- Uniform alveolar ridge with no undercuts.
- Present mesial and distal sound neighboring teeth.
- At least 4 natural remaining teeth on the same arch.
- Mouth opening at least 30 mm.
- Pregnant and lactating females. 2) Smokers. 3) Poor oral hygiene. 4) Vulnerable groups of patients' e.g. (handicapped patients).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description guided trephination-based protocol guided trephination-based drilling protocol The drilling process will be performed by guided trephination protocol. * An appropriate trephine drill (Helmut Zepf Medizintechnik GmbH, Germany) will be used to create an initial osteotomy. * The guide will be removed, and the depth and angulation of this initial osteotomy will be evaluated. * The final drill of the chosen implant system will be used to complete the osteotomy. * The implant (NeoBiotech Implant System, Neobiotech Co. Ltd. Korea) then will be placed freehand in a conventional manner. guided conventional drilling-based protocol guided Conventional drilling-based protocol The drilling process will be performed by a guided conventional drilling protocol. * Drilling (Neo NaviGuide System - Neobiotech Co. Ltd. Korea) will be performed throughout the guiding sleeve from the first drill to the final drill. * The guide will be removed. * The implant (NeoBiotech Implant System, Neobiotech Co. Ltd. Korea) then will be placed freehand in a conventional manner.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Angular deviation. immediately after the intervention measure the Angular deviation of the implant between the virtual planning position and the actual implant position
Horizontal deviation at apex of the implant. immediately after the intervention measure the Horizontal deviation at apex of the implant between the virtual planning position and the actual implant position
•Horizontal deviation at implant shoulder. immediately after the intervention measure the Horizontal deviation at the implant shoulder between the virtual planning position and the actual implant position
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Satisfaction assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale immediately after the intervention measure the patient satisfaction score on terms of pain and discomfort from 1 to 10
The duration of the surgery during the surgery measure the time of the surgery from the first drill to the implant placement
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
AinShams University
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt