Role Of Point Of Care Ultrasonography For Endotracheal Tube Placement In Neonates : A Randomized Controlled Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 44
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Malposition Rate Of Endotracheal Tube In “Conventional Method†As Compared To “Conventional Plus Ultrasonography Method†Among Neonate Requiring Mechanical Ventilation.
研究概览
简要总结
optimal Position Of Endotracheal Tube Is necessary For Safe And Effective Ventilation. Initial Estimation Of Endotracheal Tube Depth To Be Inserted Is Based Upon Various Methods That Are Weight Based, Gestation Based , Vocal Cord Guide Based, Nasotragal Length Based And Suprasternal Notch Palpation Method Based. All These Methods Are Crude Estimation Methods And Frequently Needs Manipulation Of Endotracheal Tube After Getting X-ray Chest. Often These Methods Place Endotracheal Tube At Sub-optimal Position Leading To Life Threatening Complications Such As Hypoxia, Hypercarbia, Lung Collapse, Pneumothorax. Ultrasonography To Detect Endotracheal Tube Position Has Shown Very Good Correlation With X-ray Chest in Various Previous Studies. Our Present Study Will Assess The Role Of Ultrasonography To Complement Our Conventional Method (Tochen’s Plus X-ray Chest ) In Placing Endotracheal Tube At Optimal Position In Neonates Requiring Mechanical Ventilation In Our NICU.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Outcome Assessor Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 0.00 Day(s) 至 28.00 Day(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Neonates Requiring Intubation And Mechanical Ventilation As Per Clinical Indication.
排除标准
- •Neonates With Major Upper Airway Congenital Malformation Precluding Intubation.
结局指标
主要结局
Malposition Rate Of Endotracheal Tube In “Conventional Method†As Compared To “Conventional Plus Ultrasonography Method†Among Neonate Requiring Mechanical Ventilation.
时间窗: Till Xray Chest Post Intubation
次要结局
- difference in turnaround time between intubation and USG and intubation and X ray(till Xray chest post intubation)