Diagnostic Accuracy of the Vegetative and Minimally Conscious State: Clinical Consensus Versus Standardized Neurobehavioral Assessment
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 150
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Assessed by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study was to investigate diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment
详细描述
In this study, DOC patients with clinical consensus of DOC were enrolled. The investigators used Coma Recovery Scale-revision (CRS-R) to assess consciousness levels for all DOC patients during ten days.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Cross Sectional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 85 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- •there are functional disorders caused by progressive mental diseases;
- •persistent seizures;
- •unstable vital signs;
- •double upper limb frustration, fracture.
结局指标
主要结局
Assessed by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised
时间窗: Within 10 days
All patients were assessed by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised within 10 days to detect the consciousness level. CRS-R consists of six sub-scales with 23 items, which evaluate the patients' auditory, visual, motor, Oromotor/Verbal, communication and arousal functions. For each subscale, the lower score reflected reflexivity related to the brain stem, while the higher score reflected non-reflexivity related to higher cortical functions (0-23).
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Jing Wang
Principal Investigator
Hangzhou Normal University