MedPath

Feasibility of Strategies to Increase SNAP Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program Use for Families With Food Insecurity

Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Dietary Habits
Interventions
Behavioral: Veggie Vouchers pilot
Registration Number
NCT06593028
Lead Sponsor
University of South Carolina
Brief Summary

The Veggie Vouchers pilot intervention aimed to increase awareness and utilization of an existing SNAP F\&V incentive program in South Carolina for families with food insecurity. Social determinants of health screenings were leveraged in a pediatric clinic to identify eligible families and provide information about this program. A free trial was then offered, with the long-term goal of increasing program use after the free trial ended. The primary aim was feasibility and acceptability of the Veggie Vouchers intervention among pediatricians and families.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
91
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Had a child 2-17 years of age
  • Child lived in their home 50% of the time or more
  • Child was a patient of the general pediatrics clinic enrolled in this study
  • English-speaking
  • Enrolled in SNAP
  • Experiencing household food insecurity

Caregiver

Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Had purchased fruits and vegetables within the past year at the community food site participating in this study
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Veggie Vouchers pilot interventionVeggie Vouchers pilotDuring well-child visits, caregivers received brief education from pediatricians about a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) fruit and vegetable incentive program in South Carolina. Following the clinic visit, a free trial for this SNAP fruit and vegetable incentive program was then offered. The free trial consisted of 3 vouchers, each good for one free fruit and vegetable box.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Intervention feasibility: recruitment screening eligibilityThrough study completion, approximately 1 year

Percent of caregivers screened who were eligible

Intervention feasibility: recruitment screening enrollmentThrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Percent of eligible caregivers who enrolled

Intervention feasibility: recruitment durationThrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Duration to reach the target sample

Intervention feasibility: retention attendanceThrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Assessment completion rates

Intervention feasibility: retention dropoutThrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Percent of sample that drops out or is lost to follow-up

Intervention acceptability: caregiversUpon completing the intervention, approximately 5 months after baseline

Acceptability was assessed via surveys on caregivers satisfaction of the intervention

Intervention acceptability: pediatriciansUpon completing the intervention, approximately 1 year

Acceptability was assessed via surveys on pediatricians perceptions of the intervention

Intervention acceptabilityUpon completing the intervention, approximately 3 months after baseline

Exit surveys were used to assess reasons for low utilization of the intervention

Intervention utilization: free trial redemptionThrough free trial period, approximately 3 months from baseline

How many free trial vouchers were ordered and received

Intervention utilization: SNAP purchases (box frequency)Through study completion, approximately 1 year

Number of additional fruit and vegetable boxes purchased using SNAP electronics benefit card

Intervention utilization: SNAP purchases (family uptake)Through study completion, approximately 1 year

How many families purchased additional fruit and vegetable boxes using their SNAP electronics benefit card

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Household food insecurityBaseline, after receiving each free fruit and vegetable box (~1x/month for 3 months after baseline), and end of the intervention (~5 months after baseline for redeemers; 3 months after baseline for non-redeemers)

The 18-item United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Household Food Security Module was used to assess household food security status. Scores range 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater degrees of food insecurity.

Household nutrition securityBaseline, after receiving each free fruit and vegetable box (~1x/month for 3 months after baseline), and end of the intervention (~5 months after baseline for redeemers; 3 months after baseline for non-redeemers)

The Household Nutrition Security scale was used to assess a household's ability to acquire foods that meet their nutritional needs without resource limitations or worry. Scores range 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate a greater degree of household nutrition security.

Household healthfulness choiceBaseline, after receiving each free fruit and vegetable box (~1x/month for 3 months after baseline), and end of the intervention (~5 months after baseline for redeemers; 3 months after baseline for non-redeemers)

The Household Nutrition Security scale was used to assess a household's ability to acquire foods that meet their health needs without resource limitations or worry. Scores range 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate a greater degree of household healthfulness choice.

Household dietary choiceBaseline, after receiving each free fruit and vegetable box (~1x/month for 3 months after baseline), and end of the intervention (~5 months after baseline for redeemers; 3 months after baseline for non-redeemers)

The Household Dietary Choice scale was used to assess a household's ability to acquire foods that meet their dietary preferences without resource limitations or worry. Scores range 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate a greater degree of household dietary choice

Dietary intakeBaseline, after receiving each free fruit and vegetable box (~1x/month for 3 months after baseline), and end of the intervention (~5 months after baseline for redeemers; 3 months after baseline for non-redeemers)

The National Cancer Institute's Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ) was used to assess caregiver's report of children's dietary intake. Responses are quantified as cup equivalents per day, grams per day, milligrams per day, ounce equivalents per day, or teaspoon equivalents per day. Whether higher or lower numbers indicate more healthful or less healthful dietary intake is specific to each nutrient.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of South Carolina

🇺🇸

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath