A comparative evaluation of performance of AMBU AURA40 with Proseal LMA:A randomised prospective study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare the success rate of placement and OLP for the two devices
研究概览
简要总结
Supraglottic devices play an important role in airway management.The increased use of LMA in anaesthesia practice is because of the ease of use,safety and smooth recovery.In this study we are comparing the performance between Ambu Aura40 and proseal LMA which are supraglottic airway devices.Though Proseal LMA and variants of Ambu Aura have been previously compared,there is no earlier studies in literature comparing the clinical performance of proseal LMA and Ambu Aura40.The present study is intended to compare the ease of insertion, success rate and oropharyngeal leak pressure between proseal LMA and ambu Aura40
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Not Applicable
- 盲法
- Not Applicable
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Adult patients aged between 18-60 years of either sex of ASA grade I and II scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia and where placement of supraglottic airway device is indicated will be included.
排除标准
- •Patients having respiratory or pharyngeal pathology, mouth opening <2.5 cms, Body mass index > 30 kg/m², pregnancy, full stomach, suspected difficult airway will be excluded.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the success rate of placement and OLP for the two devices
时间窗: Insertion time and number of attempts taken for placing the device noted.Hemodynamic changes assessed baseline,after induction,after insertion and 5 min after device placement.post op complications-immediate,after half an hour and after 1 hour
次要结局
- Time taken for placement(Number of attempts)