This Study Has Been Designed to Support the Working Hypothesis That Emergency Surgery in a Colon Obstruction Neoplasm is Better Than Stent Bridge Due to Better Oncological Outcomes, Analyzing the Importance of ERAS Programs in Emergency Colon Obstruction Surgery.
- Conditions
- Colon Obstruction
- Registration Number
- NCT07204665
- Lead Sponsor
- Universidad de Zaragoza
- Brief Summary
This study has been designed to support the working hypothesis that emergency surgery in a colon obstruction neoplasm is better than stent bridge due to better oncological outcomes. The primary objective is to analyse the importance of ERAS program implementation in emergency colon obstruction surgery
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Postoperative complications From enrollment to 90 days The primary objective is to analyse the importance of ERAS program implementation in emergency colon obstruction surgery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1 year survival analysis 360 days after surgery 1 year survival analysis
Overall survival 365 days after surgery Overall survival
disease-related survival 365 days after surgery disease-related survival
disease-free survival 365 days after surgery disease-free survival
Relationship between stent bridge and colon perforation 60 days after stent placement Relationship between stent bridge and colon perforation
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospital de Urduliz
🇪🇸Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain
Hospital de Urduliz🇪🇸Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain