MedPath

Intranasal Fentanyl in Combination With Midazolam Versus Midazolam Alone for Pediatric Facial Laceration Repair

Registration Number
NCT04745260
Lead Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of a combination of intranasal fentanyl and intranasal midazolam to intranasal midazolam alone for analgesia and anxiolysis in patients presenting for facial laceration repair in the pediatric emergency department.

Detailed Description

This study will be a single blind (blinded observer) randomized control trial to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of intranasal fentanyl and intranasal midazolam compared to intranasal midazolam alone for analgesia and anxiolysis during pediatric facial laceration repair.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Facial laceration requiring repair with sutures
  • English or Spanish-speaking parent/guardian
Exclusion Criteria
  • Lacerations requiring IV sedation or subspecialist involvement
  • Patient has other injuries requiring medical attention
  • Patient has vital sign instability, per physician discretion
  • Patient has autism spectrum disorder
  • Patient has allergies to either medication

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Intranasal Midazolam and Intranasal FentanylIntranasal Fentanyl Spray and Intranasal Midazolam SprayStudy participants assigned to the combination (experimental) group will receive a weight-based dose of intranasal Fentanyl (50mcg/mL concentration at 2mcg/kg up to 100mcg) followed by intranasal Midazolam (5mg/mL concentration at 0.2mg/kg up to 10mg) using a mucosal atomizer device (1mL syringe with an attached atomizer).
Intranasal MidazolamIntranasal Midazolam SprayStudy participants assigned to the control (active comparator) group will receive only intranasal Midazolam (5mg/mL concentration at 0.3mg/kg up to 10mg) using a mucosal atomizer device (1mL syringe with an attached atomizer).
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Score (mYPAS)Pre-procedure

mYPAS score at time of positioning, to be completed by blinded researcher (provider) to assess anxiety level. Scores range from 22.5 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Provider Satisfaction with Procedural Sedation (Visual Analog Score)Immediately after the procedure

VAS (visual analog score) completed by blinded researcher (provider) to rate satisfaction with level of sedation and ease of procedure. The scale will range from 0 (unsatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).

Parent Satisfaction with Anxiolysis (Visual Analog Scale)Immediately after the procedure

VAS (visual analog score) completed by parent to rate satisfaction with level of anxiolysis for procedure. The scale will range from 0 (unsatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).

Rate of Treatment FailureImmediately after the procedure

Failure of intervention to provide appropriate anxiolysis and need for IV sedation

Duration of ProcedureImmediately after the procedure

Duration of procedure from positioning to last suture placement, to be recorded by blinded researcher (provider)

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath