Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00005343
NCT00005343
Completed
Not Applicable

Social Support and CHD Risk Factors--A Community Study

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cardiovascular Diseases
Sponsor
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
20 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

To examine the mechanism through which social support affects morbidity and mortality from coronary heart disease.

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Two hypotheses have been proposed to account for the effects of social support on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Both hypotheses operate through effects on risk factors for coronary heart disease, specifically arterial blood pressure and serum lipids. The stress- buffering hypothesis states that social support functions as a social resource for individuals exposed to social stressors; those persons with more support are less vulnerable to the risk-enhancing effects of stressors. The health behavior hypothesis states that persons with more support engage in more positive health behaviors, such as avoiding tobacco; moderate alcohol use; exercise; and, a prudent diet. A major limitation in research to evaluate these alternative hypotheses has been the failure to conceptualize and measure social support in a way appropriate to detect its effects in varying social and cultural contexts. This is a major issue in research in sub-cultural communities that are also high risk communities, such as African-Americans. DESIGN NARRATIVE: A cross-sectional survey of social stressors, social supports, health behaviors, and arterial blood pressure and serum lipids was conducted in a Black community in the rural South to evaluate the relative strengths of the stress-buffering versus the health behavior hypothesis. Social support was measured using a culturally appropriate technique which was sensitive both to the distinction between kin and nonkin social support, and the modification of the effects of that support by generational status. Multiple regression analysis and path analysis were used to evaluate the alternative hypotheses.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 1993
End Date
December 1995
Last Updated
20 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
Male

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials