Gingival Augmentation Around Implants During Maintenance
- Conditions
- Failure of Dental Implant Due to Lack of Attached Gingiva
- Interventions
- Procedure: Free gingival graftProcedure: Oral prophylaxis
- Registration Number
- NCT02904551
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Brief Summary
This prospective controlled randomized blind clinical study investigated 44 implants displaying lack of KG in 29 subjects. Fourteen subjects received FGGs followed by oral prophylaxis. Fifteen subjects in the control group did not receive FGGs. The width of KG, gingival recession (GR), pocket depths (PD), plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. Changes in crestal bone levels, from baseline, were assessed at 18 months.
- Detailed Description
The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes following free gingival grafts (FGGs) around implants with limited keratinized gingiva (KG) compared to oral prophylaxis without gingival augmentation.
This prospective controlled randomized blind clinical study investigated 44 implants displaying lack of KG in 29 subjects. Fourteen subjects received FGGs followed by oral prophylaxis. Fifteen subjects in the control group did not receive FGGs. The width of KG, gingival recession (GR), pocket depths (PD), plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months.
There was a significant gain in KG with a reduction in GR in the FGG group compared to controls at 6, 12, and 18 months. The mean PI and GI were significantly lower for the FGG group at 12 and 18 months.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- less than 2 mm KG present on the facial side of implant
- implant restoration is single unsplinted unit, and has been in function for at least 6 months with an opposing dentition.
- uncontrolled hypertension
- diabetes mellitus (DM),
- subjects with a history of a long-term (>6 months) use of corticosteroid
- subjects currently taking bisphosphonates, or with a history of taking bisphosphonates regardless of route of administration
- subjects on medications that cause gingival hyperplasia
- smokers
- pregnant women.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Experimental Free gingival graft Free gingival grafts Control Oral prophylaxis Oral prophylaxis
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in the width of Keratinized Gingiva from baseline to 6, 12, 18 months 6, 12, 18 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Advanced General Dentistry at UMB DS
🇺🇸Baltimore, Maryland, United States