MedPath

Demineralized Bone Matrix Rotator Cuff Study

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Interventions
Device: Demineralized bone matrix
Registration Number
NCT04686396
Lead Sponsor
Arthrex, Inc.
Brief Summary

Patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery will experience improved tendon healing with the use of demineralized bone matrix augmentation.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective randomized study comparing the outcomes of patient undergoing rotator cuff repair with either an interpositional procedure administering demineralized bone matrix (DBM), or a control group without demineralized bone matrix. Patient outcomes will be collected and compared between the two cohorts up to a five (5) year post-operative period and will include a range of subjective and functional outcomes, along with radiographic imaging.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • The Subject is between the ages of 40 and 75 years.
  • Subject is planning to undergo arthroscopic surgery for full thickness rotator cuff tears (RCT) of supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles, who are candidates for demineralized bone matrix with BMC.
  • Two tendon tear or tear size equal to or greater than 3cm
  • Amenable to double-row repair
  • Primary rotator cuff tears with or without superior labral tear and/or biceps tear)
Exclusion Criteria
  • The Subject is unable or unwilling to sign the Patient Informed Consent, approved by the Institutional Review Board.
  • The Subject objects to use of allograft
  • Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear
  • Complete full thickness subscapularis tears of > than the superior 1/3 of the tendon (Lafosse grade 3 and above)
  • < 2 mm joint space of the glenohumeral joint on either an anteroposterior or axillary radiograph
  • Recurrent shoulder instability
  • Intra-articular injections (steroids) within 1 month of surgery
  • RCR revisions
  • Subject MRI taken more than 12 months prior to surgery
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study period
  • Workman's compensation case

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Interpositional GroupDemineralized bone matrixDemineralized bone matrix
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
MRI24 weeks

Rate of healing of the rotator cuff repair

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES score)pretreatment, 24 weeks, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year

Changes in patient self evaluation and physician assessment score

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)pretreatment, 24 weeks, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year

Changes in patient reported pain survey. 0 - 10 point scale (0 no pain, 10 worst possible pain)

Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE)pretreatment, 24 weeks, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year

Changes in patient reported affected shoulder survey base on percentage (0 - 100%, 100% being normal)

Veterans RAND Health (VR-12)pretreatment, 24 weeks, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year

Changes in patient reported general health and mental survey. Average score is 50 (negative answers bring scores down, positive answers bring score up)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Southern Oregon Orthopedics

🇺🇸

Medford, Oregon, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath