MedPath

Randomized controlled trial compares clinical outcome between Negative pressure wound therapy(NPWT) with CBH-KMITL Ambulatory Negative Pressuring Device (CKANPD) and conventional device in Open traumatic wound

Phase 2
Recruiting
Conditions
Open traumatic woundSoft tissue defect Negative pressure wound therapyVacuum dressing Open fracture
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy
Wound Healing
Wounds and Injuries
Orthopedics
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Granulation Tissue
Therapeutic Equivalency
Surgical Procedures, Operative
Soft Tissue Injuries
Registration Number
TCTR20230621008
Lead Sponsor
Researcher Private fund
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria

Patient with Open traumatic wound that after receive surgical management , soft tissue cover is not immediately possible13
Patient with wounds that require dead space management
Patient with Exposed bone with degloved skin , tendons and ligaments
Patient Open joint injuries with soft tissue loss
Age 18-60 years

Exclusion Criteria

Contraindication for VAC therapy
Presence of necrotic skin with eschar
Untreated osteomyelitis
Exposed neurovascular bundle
Exposed vascular anastomosis

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of granulation 7 day Percent / Image processing with ImageJ
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Infection rate 7 day Clinical combine with laboratory investigation
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath