Randomized controlled trial compares clinical outcome between Negative pressure wound therapy(NPWT) with CBH-KMITL Ambulatory Negative Pressuring Device (CKANPD) and conventional device in Open traumatic wound
Phase 2
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Open traumatic woundSoft tissue defect Negative pressure wound therapyVacuum dressing Open fractureNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyWound HealingWounds and InjuriesOrthopedicsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesGranulation TissueTherapeutic EquivalencySurgical Procedures, OperativeSoft Tissue Injuries
- Registration Number
- TCTR20230621008
- Lead Sponsor
- Researcher Private fund
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
Patient with Open traumatic wound that after receive surgical management , soft tissue cover is not immediately possible13
Patient with wounds that require dead space management
Patient with Exposed bone with degloved skin , tendons and ligaments
Patient Open joint injuries with soft tissue loss
Age 18-60 years
Exclusion Criteria
Contraindication for VAC therapy
Presence of necrotic skin with eschar
Untreated osteomyelitis
Exposed neurovascular bundle
Exposed vascular anastomosis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of granulation 7 day Percent / Image processing with ImageJ
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Infection rate 7 day Clinical combine with laboratory investigation