Effect of Early Integrated Neuropsychological Care in Patients With Brain Metastases - A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Brain
- Sponsor
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Enrollment
- 110
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Quality of life (QOL)
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Last Updated
- 4 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This phase II trial studies the effect of neuropsychological evaluation and intervention in maintaining quality of life after radiation therapy in patients with cancer that has spread to the brain (metastases). Quality of life refers to the overall enjoyment of life. It holds varying meanings for different people and may evolve over time. For some individuals it implies autonomy, empowerment, capability, and choice; for others, security, social integration, or freedom from stress or illness. Neuropsychological evaluation is used to examine the cognitive (thinking) consequences of brain damage, brain disease, and severe mental illness. Deterioration of both quality of life and cognitive function is common when receiving radiation to the brain. Neuropsychological evaluation with a certified neuropsychologist may improve quality of life or cognitive function after radiation therapy.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate the efficacy of neuropsychological assessment and follow up on preventing decline of quality of life (QOL) as evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale-Brain (FACT-Br) score (validated QOL tool for brain metastases). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the efficacy of early neuropsychological assessment and neurocognitive rehabilitation by a neuropsychologist on prevention of neurocognitive decline in patients treated with radiation to brain metastases as evaluated by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Delay Recall, Trail Making Test A/B (TMT A/B), and Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-8 assessment. II. To identify subsets of patients treated with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) who receive greater benefits of neuropsychologic evaluation through examining baseline Fact-Br, HVLT-R, TMT A/B, COWAT, and PROMIS-8 completed prior to radiation therapy delivery. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo neuropsychological evaluations with a certified neuropsychologist at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. ARM II: Patients receive usual care. After completion of standard of care radiation therapy, patients are followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Investigators
Joshua Palmer
Principal Investigator
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Stage IV histologic diagnosis of solid tumor
- •Patient will be treated with radiation therapy for brain metastases
- •Primarily English-speaking patient
- •Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) \>= 2 (estimated survival \> 6 months)
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patient received prior whole brain radiation therapy to the brain
- •Patient has multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's, dementia, or mental disability
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Quality of life (QOL)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after radiation therapy
Will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale-Brain instrument. Linear models will be employed to measure QOL score (converted to a 0- to 100-point scale).