MedPath

Device for Breathing Frequency Monitoring in Muscular Dystrophy

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Muscular Dystrophies
Interventions
Device: RespirH贸
Registration Number
NCT04313595
Lead Sponsor
IRCCS Eugenio Medea
Brief Summary

Patients at risk of developing respiratory dysfunctions, such as patients with severe forms of muscular dystrophy, need a careful respiratory assessment, and periodic follow-up visits to monitor the progression of the disease. Continuous monitoring of respiratory activity pattern at home could give additional understandings about disease progression, flanking traditional, intermittent, cardiopulmonary evaluations, allowing prompt clinical intervention, and anticipating respiratory dysfunction. The main objective of the present study is thus to investigate the feasibility of using an innovative wearable device for respiratory monitoring, especially breathing frequency variation assessment, in patients with muscular dystrophy. The comparison between the measurements of breathing frequency obtained by using the IMU-based device and by using the reference method provided optimal results, in terms of accuracy errors, correlation and agreement. Participants positively evaluated the device for what concerns ease of use, comfort, usability and wearability. Moreover, preliminary results confirmed that breathing frequency is an interesting breathing parameter to monitor, at the clinic and at home, because it strongly correlates with the main indexes of respiratory function

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
15
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Breathing frequency monitoringRespirH贸-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Usability of the device (System Usability Scale)After 24 hours of continued use

System Usability Scale (SUS acceptance and wearability of the device):the scores range from 0 to 100 in 2.5-point increments, with higher values meaning high perceived usability of the system

Acceptability of the device (Technological Acceptance Measure)After 24 hours of continued use

Technological Acceptance Measure (TAM) questionnaire appropriate for the medical device: with higher values meaning high acceptance of the system

Safety of the deviceAfter 24 hours of continued use

Recording of any adverse events

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Accuracy in measuring the breathing frequencyImmediately after application of the device

Comparison between the measures of respiratory rate by using the device and by using already validated instrumentation: Optoelectronic Plethysmography (OEP), optoelectronic movement analysis system.

Chest wall movements during breathing are simultaneously recorded by the RespirH贸 device and by Optoelectronic Plethysmography (OEP), in static conditions, and in particular, in supine and seated positions.

OEP allows assessment of ventilatory and breathing pattern by measuring chest-wall movements related to breathing, by using motion capture principles.

Using OEP as reference method it is possible to compare the data recorded with the thoracic and abdominal units of the device RespirH贸 with those obtained by using OEP for the thoracic and abdominal compartments

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

IRCCS Medea

馃嚠馃嚬

Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy

漏 Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath