Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06001411
NCT06001411Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Effect of Preoperative Prone Position Training on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Min Su1 site in 1 country140 target enrollmentStarted: August 21, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
140
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications(PPCs)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Colorectal cancer is a common digestive tract tumor in China. At present, laparoscopic surgery has become the classic operation of colorectal cancer surgery compared with the traditional open abdominal surgery. Although laparoscopic surgery has many advantages, such as less pain, faster recovery and so on. However, relevant studies have shown that postoperative pulmonary complications are more common in patients undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, which contribute to significant increases in morbidity, mortality, length of postoperative hospital stay and medical consumption.

The incidence of pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery has been reported to be between 9% and 40%.

The reduction in pulmonary volume and respiratory muscular activation after major abdominal surgery due to surgery-related shallow breathing, pain, long-term bed rest, mucociliary clearance disorder, and diaphragmatic dysfunction may be the main causes of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Numerous studies have demonstrated physiological improvement related to prone positioning. Prone positioning consists of placing a patient face down. Prone positioning has been used for to improve oxygenation in patients who require invasive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). It has also been applied to non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), to improve oxygenation and delay or even avoid the need for invasive ventilation. So, the purpose of this study is to observe whether preoperative prone position training can reduce the incidence of pulmonary complications after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Detailed Description

Colorectal cancer is a common digestive tract tumor in China. At present, laparoscopic surgery has become the classic operation of colorectal cancer surgery compared with the traditional open abdominal surgery. Although laparoscopic surgery has many advantages, such as less pain, faster recovery. However, relevant studies have shown that postoperative pulmonary complications are more common in patients undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, which contribute to significant increases in morbidity, mortality, length of postoperative hospital stay and medical consumption.

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) refer to the clinical abnormal changes in the lungs after surgery, These include lung infections (pneumonia), atelectasis, pleural effusion, bronchospasm, acute respiratory failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The incidence of pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery has been reported to be between 9% and 40%.

The reduction in pulmonary volume and respiratory muscular activation after major abdominal surgery due to surgery-related shallow breathing, pain, long-term bed rest, mucociliary clearance disorder, and diaphragmatic dysfunction may be the main causes of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Numerous studies have demonstrated physiological improvement related to prone positioning. Prone positioning consists of placing a patient face down. Prone positioning has been used for more than 40 years to improve oxygenation in patients who require invasive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Because of the positive physiological effects of prone positioning on transpulmonary pressure, lung compression and ventilation perfusion ratio, it has also been applied to non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), to improve oxygenation and delay or even avoid the need for invasive ventilation.

Currently, the mechanisms of prone position training are decreased lung compression in the gravity dependant zone,homogenisation of transpulmonary pressure, improvement of ventilation/perfusion ratio, and reduction of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) or patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI). By placing the patient in the prone position, the lungs compression due to its own weight is reduced via a gravitational-dependent redistribution of fluids. In addition, the weight of the mediastinum is supported by the sternum, the stiffer part of the chest. At the same time, the diaphragm is displaced caudally, decreasing compression of the posterior-caudal lung parenchyma. Finally, in a triangular-shaped lung, more parenchyma is included in the dorsal half than in the ventral one resulting in a more aerated lung in prone positioning.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •age over 18 years old
  • •Clinical diagnosis of colorectal cancer

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Emergency surgery
  • •Cognitive dysfunction
  • •American Society of Anesthesiologists class ⩾IV
  • •Fractures (face, collarbone, ribs, spine, limbs)
  • •History of spontaneous pneumothorax
  • •Increased intracranial pressure
  • •pregnancy
  • •Systemic infection
  • •Acute respiratory failure
  • •Patients with hemodynamic instability
  • •Other conditions that are not suitable for prone position
  • •Failure to obtain informed consent

Arms & Interventions

Prone Position Training group (PPT group)

Experimental

All patients were admitted to our hospital at least 3 days before surgery. Patients in the intervention group (PPT group) received the prone position training daily in the hospital, three times a day, and about 1 hours every times, for at least 3 days before surgery. On the day of admission to the hospital, the patients in the PPT group were instructed to perform prone position training by nurses who were previously trained by prone position training.

Intervention: Prone Position Training (Behavioral)

Control group (C group)

Placebo Comparator

Patients in the control group (C group) received standard perioperative care without any prone position training.

Intervention: control group (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications(PPCs)

Time Frame: 7 day after surgery

The PPCs included pneumonia, atelectasis, pleural effusion, respiratory failure, and unplanned intubations

Secondary Outcomes

  • arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)(preoperatively prior to starting prone position training, entering the operating room, the first day after surgery, the second day after surgery, and the third day after surgery)
  • extubation time(Day of surgery)
  • Peak airway pressure(Intraoperative)
  • oxygenation index (OI)(preoperatively prior to starting prone position training, entering the operating room, the first day after surgery, the second day after surgery, and the third day after surgery)
  • arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)(preoperatively prior to starting prone position training, entering the operating room, the first day after surgery, the second day after surgery, and the third day after surgery)

Investigators

Sponsor
Min Su
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Min Su

Professor of Anesthesiology

First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials