Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00158873
NCT00158873CompletedPhase 4

A Centre-Randomized, Open-Label, Cross-Over Study to Compare the Pharmaco-Economic Consequences of an Ultiva (Remifentanil Hydrochloride) Based Regimen With Conventional Sedative Based Regimens in ICU Subjects Requiring Short-Term Mechanical Ventilation With Analgesia and Sedation

GlaxoSmithKline15 sites in 1 country224 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2004Last updated:
Conditions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 4
Status
Completed
Enrollment
224
Locations
15
Primary Endpoint
Health Outcome: Duration of time on mechanical ventilation

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The study will evaluate the pharmaco-economic consequences of the use of a remifentanil based regimen compared with a conventional sedative based regimen in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU, difference in extubation time and use of concomitant sedative agents.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •ICU patients with an expected duration of mechanical ventilation for 2 to 3 days and requiring analgesia and sedation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •ICU patients resuscitated in the previous 24 hours, neurotrauma or expecting major surgery, not likely to survive of with limit care status.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Health Outcome: Duration of time on mechanical ventilation

Secondary Outcomes

  • Health Outcome: length of stay in ICU, in hospital, requirement of opioid and sedative agents, duration of extubation process. Safety: haemodynamics and adverse events. Efficacy: sedation and pain scores

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Industry

Study Sites (15)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials