COMPARISON OF RATE OF SPACE CLOSURE USING APPLIANCE WITH CONVENTIONAL AND NON-CONVENTIONAL ELASTOMERIC MODULES WITH PASSIVE SELF-LIGATING BRACKETS
Phase 1
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- GOOD
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/04/013197
- Lead Sponsor
- Shabeer NT
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Class 1 malocclusion with mild to moderate crowding <5mm
Healthy patient without any systemic diseases.
Good oral hygiene.
Patient requiring all first premolar extractions
Exclusion Criteria
Patient with systemic and medical illness.
Periodontally compromised dentition.
Non extraction cases.
Crowding >5mm
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the rate of canine retraction in patients treated with self-ligation brackets, nonconventional elastomeric modules and conventional elastomeric modules in extraction caseTimepoint: T1-After completion of initial alignment. <br/ ><br>T2-After canine retraction. <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ONETimepoint: NI