NCT05883150
Completed
Phase 2
Intranasal Versus Nebulized Midazolam in Behaviuor Modification of Preschool Children Undergoing Dental Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Nourhan M.Aly1 site in 1 country68 target enrollmentNovember 10, 2022
ConditionsDental Sedation
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Nebulized Midazolam
- Conditions
- Dental Sedation
- Sponsor
- Nourhan M.Aly
- Enrollment
- 68
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Behavior rating
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of the current study is to compare the effect of intranasal versus nebulized route of administration of midazolam as moderate sedative agents in preschoolers undergoing dental treatment.
Investigators
Nourhan M.Aly
Assistant Lecturer of Dental Public Health
University of Alexandria
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Frankl scale score
- •ASA I or II physical status.
- •Dental intervention under local anesthesia not requiring more than 30 minutes.
- •No previous dental experience.
- •Parent/guardian's written consent.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Dental treatment indicated under general anesthesia.
- •Presence of facial or nasal deformities.
- •History of neurological or cognitive alterations.
- •Mouth breathers
Arms & Interventions
Nebulized Midazolam
Intervention: Nebulized Midazolam
Intranasal Midazolam
Intervention: Intranasal Midazolam
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Behavior rating
Time Frame: throughout the sedation session
This will be recorded using the Modified Houpt scale for behavior rating; Sleep, head/oral resistance, crying and overall behavior will be scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 1-6 with higher scores indicating better behavior
Secondary Outcomes
- Level of sedation(during the sedation procedure (after drug administration until reaching satisfactory sedation))
- Onset of sedation(during the sedation procedure (after drug administration until reaching satisfactory sedation))
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 2
Comparative Evaluation of Two Sedatives in Pediatric Dental Procedure - A Randomized Clinical TrialHealth Condition 1: K040- PulpitisCTRI/2022/02/040572arsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital25
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Comparison of two sedative agents in relation to safety in children.Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: 3- AdministrationCTRI/2019/09/021381eethu Ann Preethy
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A Comparison of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine as Medication to be given in Nose before Anesthesia in Lower Body Surgeries of ChildreHealth Condition 1: Q00-Q99- Congenital malformations, deformations and chromosomal abnormalitiesCTRI/2019/06/019711Dr Aikta Gupta
Completed
Not Applicable
Nasal Versus Oral Midazolam Sedation in Routine Pediatric Dental CareConscious SedationNCT02679781Hadassah Medical Organization70
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
To study the efficacy of Midazolam and its combination with ketamine through the nasal route before transferring children from parent company to the operation theatre, who are scheduled for surgery.CTRI/2020/05/025229Dr Aarti Agarwal