MedPath

Pain Assessment Following Placement of a Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy and Predictive Factors

Recruiting
Conditions
Gastrostomy
Gastrostomy Complications
Registration Number
NCT05618392
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier de Valence
Brief Summary

A 12 months mono-center, descriptive study, to evaluate pain and predictive factors Following placement of percutaneous Radiologic gastrostomy (PRG).

The primary objective is to evaluate the abdominal pain associated with percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) placement.

Detailed Description

PRG is a pathway first of all enteral nutrition that has several advantages: local anesthesia, possible in case of esophageal stenosis, Rates of successful tube placement higher for radiologic gastrostomy than for percutaneous endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG).

Abdominal pain following percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) placement is a recognized complication. However, the prevalence and degree of severity of pain are poorly characterized. This pain often requires antalgic treatment.

The primary objective is to evaluate the abdominal pain from Baseline until 7 days after radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) placement.

The secondary objective is to evaluate predictive factors

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • Needing a radiologic gastrostomy under local anesthesia
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Read, write and understand the French language
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient under guardianship, deprived of liberty, safeguard of justice
  • Patient presenting a serious psychiatric pathology that does not allow compliance with the completion of the questionnaires (at the discretion of the investigator)
  • Refusal to participate in research

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
abdominal pain7 days

numerical scale 0 to 10, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "the worst pain imaginable."

predictive factorsDAY 1

determine predictive factors of pain suspected in advance:

* Fasting anterior stomach wall depth estimated during the ultrasound survey(mm)

* Gastric topography determined under X-ray (subcostal / partially retrohepatic)

* Topography of the anchors: large tuberosity / antrum

* Distance of anchors from each other (mm)

* Depth of the anchors (mm)

* Skin depression of anchors: (with depression, without depression)

* Intraparietal length of the gastrostomy tube (mm)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Sandrine Beauchard

🇫🇷

Valence, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath