Laparoscopic Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Sacral Colpopexy and Paravaginal Repair
- Conditions
- CystocelePelvic Organ Prolapse
- Interventions
- Device: 2D mode of the 3D Laparoscopic Video SystemDevice: 3D mode of the 3D Laparoscopic Video System
- Registration Number
- NCT02258230
- Lead Sponsor
- Olympus Corporation of the Americas
- Brief Summary
Compare operative times and complications of sacral colpopexy and paravaginal repair between two-dimensional and three-dimensional laparoscopic systems.
- Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to compare operative times of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSC) for the treatment of symptomatic vaginal vault prolapse as well as paravaginal repair (PVR) for symptomatic cystocele between two-dimensional and three-dimensional laparoscopic systems. Additionally this study will evaluate postoperative complications from surgeries performed using two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopic systems.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 194
- Symptomatic vaginal vault prolapse (stage 2 or greater point C-1 pelvic organ prolapse quantification [POP-Q] or grade 2 or greater Baden-Walker half way system) undergoing laparoscopic sacral colpopexy
And/Or
- Symptomatic cystocele (stage 2 or greater, point Aa or Ba > -1 POP-Q or grade 2 or greater Baden-Walker half way system) undergoing laparoscopic paravaginal repair
- Age less than 18 years
- Inability to comprehend questionnaires
- Inability to give informed consent or to return for review
- Vaginal vault prolapse < stage 2
- Unable to undergo general anesthesia
- More than 5 previous laparotomies
- Prior sacral colpopexy or vaginal mesh prolapse procedure
- Prior surgery involving the retropubic space
- Vaginal length less than 6 cm
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 2D mode LSC 2D mode of the 3D Laparoscopic Video System 2D mode of the 3D Laparoscopic Video System for the Laprascopic Sacral Colpopexy (LSC) arm. Use of the 3D laparoscopic system can be switched to either 2D or 3D. 2D mode PVR 2D mode of the 3D Laparoscopic Video System 2D mode of the 3D Laparoscopic Video System for the Paravaginal Repair (PVR) arm. Use of the 3D laparoscopic system can be switched to either 2D or 3D. 3D mode LSC 3D mode of the 3D Laparoscopic Video System 3D mode of the 3D Laparoscopic Video System for the Laprascopic Sacral Colpopexy (LSC) arm. Use of the 3D laparoscopic system can be switched to either 2D or 3D. 3D mode PVR 3D mode of the 3D Laparoscopic Video System 3D mode of the 3D Laparoscopic Video System for the Paravaginal Repair (PVR) arm. Use of the 3D laparoscopic system can be switched to either 2D or 3D.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Operative Times Intraoperative Operative times of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and paravaginal repair procedures from the first part of dissection until closure of the peritoneum.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Complications Intraoperative up to 6 weeks post procedure Intraoperative complications will be recorded. Post operative complications will be reported for the first 6 weeks after the procedure.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Northside Hospital
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Beverly Hills Sunset Surgery Center
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States