A Prospective Comparative Study of Partially Absorbable Mesh vs Non- Absorbable Mesh in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Inguinal hernia is one of the most common abdominal wall hernias encountered in clinical practice, and laparoscopic mesh repair has become a widely accepted standard of care. However, long-term complications such as chronic groin pain, foreign body sensation, and mesh-related discomfort continue to affect patient quality of life. Non-absorbable polypropylene meshes, while effective in preventing recurrence, have been associated with these persistent postoperative issues. In response, partially absorbable composite meshes have been developed to reduce the permanent foreign material load in the body, potentially enhancing patient comfort without compromising surgical outcomes. The purpose of this trial is to prospectively compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of partially absorbable mesh versus non-absorbable mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. By evaluating postoperative pain, complications, and recurrence rates, the study aims to identify which mesh type offers better postoperative outcomes, thereby helping surgeons in optimal mesh selection and improving long-term results in hernia surgery.