A Clinical Evaluation of Two Contact Lenses Used With Three Care Systems

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Myopia

Interventions: Device: comfilcon A
Device: fanfilcon A

Registration Number: NCT04195581

Lead Sponsor: Coopervision, Inc.

Brief Summary: The objective of the study was to compare the clinical performance of the two contact lenses when used in combination with three care systems.

Detailed Description: This was a randomized, open-label, crossover study, controlled by cross-comparison. Subjects were randomized to wear each lens and solution combination for a month in random sequence; that is for a total of six months.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 33

Inclusion Criteria

They are aged 18-50 and have capacity to volunteer.
They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
They are an existing wearer of reusable, single vision, spherical soft contact lenses.
They have a contact lens spherical prescription between -1.00 to - 6.50D (inclusive)
They have a spectacle cylindrical correction of -1.00D or less in each eye.
At dispensing, they can attain at least 0.20 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in each eye with the study lenses within the available power range.
They are willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least five days per week and for at least eight hours per day).
They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
They have had cataract surgery.
They have had corneal refractive surgery.
They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
They are pregnant or breastfeeding.
They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
They have any infectious disease which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: CROSSOVER

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
comfilcon A with Hy-Care Multi-purpose solution	comfilcon A	Subjects were randomized to wear each lens and solution combination for a month.
fanfilcon A with Refine One Step Hydrogen Peroxide Solution	fanfilcon A	Subjects were randomized to wear each lens and solution combination for a month.
comfilcon A with All in One Light Multi-purpose solution	comfilcon A	Subjects were randomized to wear each lens and solution combination for a month.
comfilcon A with Refine One Step Hydrogen Peroxide Solution	comfilcon A	Subjects were randomized to wear each lens and solution combination for a month.
fanfilcon A with Hy-Care Multi-purpose solution	fanfilcon A	Subjects were randomized to wear each lens and solution combination for a month.
fanfilcon A with All in One Light multi-purpose solution	fanfilcon A	Subjects were randomized to wear each lens and solution combination for a month.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Overall Comfort	One Month	Overall Comfort will be assessed using vertical visual analogue scales (0-100) (0 - Causes Pain. Cannot be tolerated, 20 -Very uncomfortable, very irritating or annoying, 40 - Slightly uncomfortable, just irritating or annoying, 60 - Comfortable. Noticeable but not irritating, 80 - Very comfortable. Just felt occasionally, 100 - Excellent. Cannot be felt).
Comfort on Insertion	One Month	Comfort on insertion will be assessed using vertical visual analogue scales (0-100) (0 - Causes Pain. Cannot be tolerated, 20 -Very uncomfortable, very irritating or annoying, 40 - Slightly uncomfortable, just irritating or annoying, 60 - Comfortable. Noticeable but not irritating, 80 - Very comfortable. Just felt occasionally, 100 - Excellent. Cannot be felt).
Comfort Before Removal	One Month	Comfort before removal will be assessed using vertical visual analogue scales (0-100) (0 - Causes Pain. Cannot be tolerated, 20 -Very uncomfortable, very irritating or annoying, 40 - Slightly uncomfortable, just irritating or annoying, 60 - Comfortable. Noticeable but not irritating, 80 - Very comfortable. Just felt occasionally, 100 - Excellent. Cannot be felt).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Vision	One Month	Vision will be assessed using vertical visual analogue scales (0-100) (0 - Unacceptable. Lens cannot be worn, 20 - Very poor. Marked and unacceptable reduction, 40 - Poor. Noticeable but acceptable reduction, 60 - Good. Occasional but acceptable reduction, 80 - Very good. Just noticeable and very occasional reduction, 100 -Excellent. Unaware of any visual loss)
Variable Vision	One Month	Variable Vision will be assessed using vertical visual analogue scales (0-100) (0 - Extremely poor. Intolerable levels of variation in vision, 20 - Very poor. Excessive variation in vision which definitely affects wearing my contact lenses, 40 - Poor. A level of variation in vision which is sometimes annoying, Good. Acceptable level of variation in vision, 80 - Very good. Very occasional or very slight sensation of variation in vision, 100 - Excellent. No variation in vision).
Dryness	One Month	Dryness will be assessed using vertical visual analogue scales (0-100) (0 - Extremely poor. Intolerable levels of dryness, 20 - Very poor. Dryness which definitely affects wearing my contact lenses, 40 - Poor. A level of dryness which is sometimes annoying, 60 - Good. Acceptable level of dryness, 80 - Very good. Very occasional or very slight sensation of dryness only, 100 - Excellent. I have no sensation of dryness whatsoever).
Burning/Stinging	One Month	Burning/Stinging will be assessed using vertical visual analogue scales (0-100) (0 - Extremely poor. Intolerable levels of burning or stinging, 20 - Very poor. Excessive burning or stinging which definitely affects wearing my contact lenses, 40 - Poor. A level of burning or stinging which is sometimes annoying, 60 - Good. Acceptable level of burning or stinging, 80 - Very good. Very occasional or very slight sensation of burning or stinging, 100 - Excellent. No burning or stinging).
Vision at Night	One Month	Vision at night will be assessed using vertical visual analogue scales (0-100) (0 - Unacceptable. Lens cannot be worn, 20 - Very poor. Marked and unacceptable reduction, 40 - Poor. Noticeable but acceptable reduction, 60 - Good. Occasional but acceptable reduction, 80 - Very good. Just noticeable and very occasional reduction, 100 -Excellent. Unaware of any visual loss)
Ocular Redness	One Month	Ocular Redness will be assessed using vertical visual analogue scales (0-100) (0 - Extremely poor. Intolerable levels of redness, 20 - Very poor. Excessive redness which definitely affects wearing my contact lenses, 40 - Poor. A level of redness which is sometimes annoying, 60 - Good. Acceptable level of redness, 80 - Very good. Very occasional or very slight awareness of redness, 100 - Excellent. No redness).
Ease of Lens Insertion	One Month	Ease of lens insertion will be assessed using vertical visual analogue scales 0-100. (0 - Unmanageable. Lenses impossible to insert, 20 - Very poor. Difficult and occasional unsuccessful insertion, 40 - Poor. Difficult with very occasional unsuccessful insertion, 60 - Good. Some problems but lens insertion usually successful, 80 - Very good. Occasional difficulty with lens insertion, 100 - Excellent. No problems with lens insertion).
Ease of Lens Removal	One Month	Ease of lens removal will be assessed using vertical visual analogue scales (0-100) ( 0 - Unmanageable. Lenses impossible to remove, 20 - Very poor. Difficult and occasional unsuccessful removal, 40 - Poor. Difficult with very occasional unsuccessful removal, 60 - Good. Some problems but lens removal usually successful, 80 - Very good. Occasional difficulty with lens removal, 100 - Excellent. No problems with lens removal).