Evaluation of the Impact of a Digital Tool MEDIASCREEN of Preventive Information for Patients on the Knowledge of the Risk of Pressure Sores Acquired During a Hospitalization

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Pressure Sore
• Interventions: Other: Paper prevention; Other: Numeric prevention

• Registration Number: NCT05547295
• Lead Sponsor: Pôle Saint Hélier

Brief Summary

The study focuses on the impact of a digital MEDIASCREEN tool on the knowledge, technical know-how and behavioural skills in terms of pressure sores of patients. In addition, the cognitive impact of this type of tool will also be studied in our study population (self-esteem and feeling of personal effectiveness). The objective is to compare the impact of a digital MEDIASCREEN information tool with information tool compared to the usual paper-based prevention materials on knowledge of the risk of hospital-acquired pressure sores.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2022-07-07
• Study First Submitted QC: 2022-09-16
• Study First Posted: 2022-09-21
• Study Start: 2022-10-27
• Status Verified: 2024-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-01-16
• Last Update Posted: 2024-01-17
• Primary Completion: 2024-07-26
• Study Completion: 2024-07-26

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

• Patient in complete hospitalization in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
• Patient affiliated to a social security system
• Patient presenting a low to high risk of pressure ulcer inferior or equal to or equal to 16 on the Norton scale
• Patient having signed his consent

Exclusion Criteria

• Difficulty understanding and is unable to give free and informed consent
• Pregnant women
• Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative administrative decision
• Major under legal protection by a judicial or administrative decision.
• Person in an emergency situation unable to give their informed consent

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Paper Information	Paper prevention	Patient will have classic paper information for prevention of pressure sores
Numeric information from MEDIASCREEN	Numeric prevention	Patient will have information for prevention of pressure sores throught the digital tool MEDIASCREEN

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Evaluate the change on the knowledge of the risk of hospital-acquired pressure sores with a digital MEDIASCREEN information tool in comparison to the usual paper-based prevention materials	Change from baseline knowledge at 1 month	The comparison will be done with Skin-Management Needs Assessment Checklist score (SMNac). Minimum value =0, Maximum value = 100; higher score better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Evaluate patient satisfaction with the information delivered by the MEDIASCREEN digital tool	At 1 month	Measured by Visual Analogic scale from 0 to 100. Zero is represented : "Not at all satisfied" and 100 : "Completely satisfied".; Higher scores better outcome.
Assess the cognitive impact of the prevention information delivered by MEDIASCREEN tool, on self-esteem.	At the beginning and at 1 month	Measured of self-esteem with Rosenberg scale. Score range : 10-40. High scores indicate high self esteem.
Evaluate the occurrence of pressure sores during hospitalization	At the beginning and at 1 month	Count of the apparition number of pressure sores.
Evaluate the acquisition of knowledge by patients	At 1 month	Evaluate with questionnaire of knowledge, compose by 5 questions on three points each. The overall questionnaire will be on 15 points.; Higher scores better outcome.
Evaluate the acceptability of the digital information tool MEDIASCREEN digital information tool or the paper information brochure.	At the beggining and at 1 month	The acceptability will be assessed using a 13-item questionnaire based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Each question is based on a Likert-type 5 point scale ranging from : 1=In total disagreement, 2= Somewhat disagree, 3= Neither agree nor disagree, 4= Somewhat agree, 5=In total agreement.
Assess the cognitive impact of the prevention information delivered by MEDIASCREEN tool, on sense of self-efficacy.	At the beginning and at 1 month	Measured of self-efficacy with scale to evaluate the feeling of personal effectiveness (MSES) Score range: 16-80. High scores indicate high feeling of personal effectiveness.
Evaluate the psychological impact of information delivered from the tools	At 1 month	Measured by Visual Analogic scale from 0 to 100. Zero is represented : "No knowledge" and 100 : "Perfectly mastered subject".; Higher scores better outcome.
Evaluate the observance when using the digital tool MEDIASCREEN.	At 1 month	Measured by the connexion data : number of connexion, duration of connexion, percentage of completion.
Evaluate the user experience when using the digital tool MEDIASCREEN.	At 1 month	Measured by Questionnaire Attrakdiff for the user experience. The AttrakDiff questionnaire contains 28 question with 7 Likert-type scale from -3 to 3.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Pôle Saint-Hélier; 🇫🇷 Rennes, Bretagne, France