Understanding Patient Preference on Colorectal Cancer Screening Options
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 297
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Blood-based screening test order rates
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Early detection by screening significantly reduces mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). However, CRC screening rates have plateaued, with a considerable segment of the population remaining unscreened. Not being up to date with screening was associated with an approximate 3-fold risk for CRC-related mortality. There are different well-established CRC screening modalities, including invasive and non-invasive, which detect both polyps and cancer or cancer alone. Colonoscopy remains the dominant screening modality in the U.S.; however, colonoscopy uptake is low due to the invasiveness, perception of discomfort and embarrassment, logistical challenges, cost, and potential risks.
Increasing patient compliance and adherence to screening is critical to improving CRC outcomes. A key to enhancing screening participation is patient acceptance of the testing method. A blood-based screening test presents an opportunity to overcome some challenging barriers. Blood-based tests are non-invasive compared to colonoscopy and can easily be part of a standard medical office appointment for a wellness check or scheduled visits to manage chronic illnesses and be completed at the point of care. This study will examine patient preference to use a blood-based screening test and compliance with CRC screening recommendations after failing to complete the FIT (Fecal Immunochemical Test)/FOBT (Fecal Occult Blood Test) or colonoscopy order in six months. Compliance with CRC screening is particularly poor among medically underserved populations, and most of these vulnerable individuals use federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) to obtain care. Implementing a blood-based screening test at FQHCs has the potential to improve CRC screening uptake and adherence and improve health disparities in medically underserved populations.
This study seeks to answer the following four questions: 1) What is the acceptability of a blood-based screening as an alternative for patients who failed to complete a prior order using traditional screening methods? 2) Are patients who failed to comply with traditional screening methods more likely to comply with a blood-based screening test? 3) What is the effect of offering a blood-based screening test for patients who are non-compliance with traditional screening methods on overall CRC screening rates? 4) What are the facilitators and barriers to implementing the blood-based screening test in clinical settings?
Detailed Description
Significance
A key to improving screening participation is patient acceptance of the testing method. Indeed, all screening modalities have benefits over time, and compliance with testing is essential for successful screening. A blood-based screening test can easily be part of a routine clinic visit, and the patient can complete the test while still at the clinic. Patients are accustomed to providing blood samples for other screening tests, such as cholesterol screening (the national screening rate was 87% in 2019), and the use of a blood-based CRC screening test is more in line with a patient's expectations of medical care. On January 19, 2021, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced that the blood-based biomarker test is an appropriate CRC screening once every three years for Medicare patients when performed in a CLIA-certified laboratory, ordered by a treating physician, and the blood-based biomarker screening test has a sensitivity greater than or equal to 74% and a specificity greater than or equal to 90% in the detection of CRC.
The last decades have seen many discovery studies identifying promising biomarkers of CRC. Improving testing methods for blood-based CRC testing have been developed and implemented in clinical settings as well. The first blood-based CRC screening test, SEPT9 DNA (Epi proColon), was approved by the FDA in 2016 for persons at average risk for CRC who have chosen not to undergo screening by existing guideline-recommended methods. This study will offer a lab-developed Guardant SHIELD blood-based CRC screening test to patients who failed to complete a stool-based screening test or a colonoscopy six months after receiving an order from their providers. The Guardant SHIELD blood-based screening test will be free to the patients with an order from their providers. The Guardant SHIELD test is a multimodal blood-based colorectal neoplasia detection assay incorporating ctDNA (circulating tumor DNA) assessment of somatic mutations and tumor-derived methylation and fragmentomic patterns to maximize early-stage CRC detection sensitivity. Overall, the Guardant SHIELD blood-based test has a CRC sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 94%, meeting the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services requirement (74% for sensitivity and 90% for specificity). All the blood samples collected in this study will be processed at the CLIA-certified Guardant Health Laboratory.
Compliance by age-eligible patients is essential to the success of any screening program. However, the acceptance by health care providers and the health care system is also critical, and especially colonoscopy remains the dominant modality for CRC in the U.S. Applying the current state of research evidence to health care involves fostering the adoption, implementation, spread, and sustainability of new evidence-based interventions to care. Furthermore, transferring effective interventions into real-world settings and maintaining them is a complicated, long-term process that requires complex phases of intervention diffusion. In this study, the investigators will examine the inclusion of a blood-based screening option to increase patient compliance with CRC screening while developing implementation strategies to facilitate the adoption of a new blood-based screening test at primary care clinics.
The overall goal of the study is two-fold: 1) examine patient preference when a blood-based CRC screening option is available, and compliance with CRC screening, especially among diverse and vulnerable populations; and 2) understand how to increase the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of an evidence-based screening method to improve CRC screening uptake and adherence.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Observational Model
- Cohort
- Time Perspective
- Prospective
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 45 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Between 45-75 years of age
- •Have an average risk for colorectal cancer
- •A patient at one of our partner FQHCs
- •Received a screening order (either using a stool-based test or colonoscopy) six months ago and failed or refused to complete the screening test
- •Able to comprehend and willing to give informed consent
- •Able and willing to provide a blood sample per protocol
Exclusion Criteria
- •Family history
- •One first-degree relative diagnosed with CRC or advanced adenoma at age < 60 years
- •Two first-degree relatives diagnosed with CRC or advanced adenoma at any age
- •Known hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes, such as Lynch Syndrome or Familial Adenomatous and Polyposis (FAP)
- •Personal History
- •History of CRC or adenoma
- •History of cancers
- •History of inflammatory bowel disease, including chronic ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease
- •Have a recorded up-to-date CRC screening
- •Blood product transfusion in the past 120 days
- •A medical condition that, in the opinion of the patient's health provider, should preclude enrollment in the study
Arms & Interventions
Federally Qualified Health Center 1
Patients who received an order for colorectal cancer screening, either using a stool-based test or colonoscopy, but failed to complete the screening after six months will be recruited to participate in the study.
Intervention: Guardant SHIELD blood-based colorectal cancer screening test (Device)
Federally Qualified Health Center 2
Patients who received an order for colorectal cancer screening, either using a stool-based test or colonoscopy, but failed to complete the screening after six months will be recruited to participate in the study.
Intervention: Guardant SHIELD blood-based colorectal cancer screening test (Device)
Federally Qualified Health Center 3
Patients who received an order for colorectal cancer screening, either using a stool-based test or colonoscopy, but failed to complete the screening after six months will be recruited to participate in the study.
Intervention: Guardant SHIELD blood-based colorectal cancer screening test (Device)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Blood-based screening test order rates
Time Frame: 60 days after enrolling in the study
Number of unique patients who enrolled in the study and received a blood-based screening test order from their providers
Blood-based test compliant rates
Time Frame: 90 days after received an order for a blood-based screening test
Patients who enrolled in the study , received an order for a blood-based screening test, and completed the test
Secondary Outcomes
- Follow-up colonoscopy completion rates(180 days after received the abnormal blood-based screening test result)
- Patient satisfaction with the blood-based test(30 days after the patient completed the blood-based screening test and received the test result)
Investigators
Karen Kim
Professor Department of Medicine
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
