Trial to Compare the SherpaPak™ Device vs Cold Storage
- Conditions
- Organ Transplant
- Registration Number
- NCT05194514
- Lead Sponsor
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- Brief Summary
- The Investigator's are doing this study to see which method of organ preservation leads to better outcomes for donated hearts. 
 There are two methods of organ preservation. The first method is the use of cold storage. With this method, the donor heart is stored in preservation fluid within bags that are then placed on ice and transported in a cooler. This is the usual method for transporting donor hearts. This is also known as "standard of care."
 The second method is the use of the SherpaPak™ Cardiac Transport System. With this method, the donor heart is kept at a steady, consistent temperature throughout transportation. This method is not typically used for transporting donor hearts.
 The study will include up to 20 people in total.
- Detailed Description
- This is a randomized study and has 2 study groups. Participants will be randomly assigned to a group in a 1:1 ratio. 
 * 50% chance of receiving a donor heart using the SherpaPak™ method, or
 * 50% chance of receiving a donor heart using the cold storage method.
 The research team will analyze data from the medical records from the heart transplant and clinic visits up to 30 days after the heart transplant. Participants will be in the study for about 30 days.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Any sex/gender, 18 years of age or older listed for primary heart transplant.
- Subjects must be willing and be capable of understanding the purpose and risks of the study and must sign a statement of informed consent OR consent of a legally authorized representative of a cognitively impaired individual will be obtained before the cognitively impaired individual may be included in research.
- Signed: 1) written informed consent document and 2) authorization to use and disclose protected health information
- Subjects must receive and accept a non-local donor offer (from Northern California, Arizona, Nevada or farther geographies)
- Re-do heart transplant
- Multi-organ transplant
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
- Name - Time - Method - 30-day Post-transplant Survival - 30 day post heart transplant (htx) - Freedom From 30-day Ischemic Reperfusion Injury - 30 day post htx - Absence of Moderate to Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction (Left or Right Ventricle) - 24 hours post-transplant - Percentage of subjects without moderate to severe primary graft dysfunction (left or right ventricle) - Freedom From 30-day Biopsy Proven Rejection - 30 day post htx - Freedom From 30-day Any-treated Rejection - 30 day post htx 
- Secondary Outcome Measures
- Name - Time - Method - Hospital Length of Stay - within 30 days - Hospital Length of Stay - Acute Cellular Rejection - 30 days - Cardiac Index - 24 hours post-transplant - Cardiac Output - 24 hours post-transplant - Mean Arterial Pressure - 24 hours post-transplant - Pulmonary Arterial Pressure - 24 hours post-transplant - Vasoactive-Inotropic Score - 24 hours post-transplant - Vasoactive inotropic scores (VIS) are used to measure the amount of cardiovascular support a patient is receiving at certain time point, for our study it was at 24hrs post transplant. Below is the calculation for the score. 
 VIS = dopamine (µg/kg/min) + dobutamine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × epinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × norepinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 10 × milrinone (µg/kg/min) + 10,000 × vasopressin (units/kg/min) + 50 × levosimendan (µg/kg/min).
 The minimum score is 0 if the patient does not require any support but there really isn't a maximum score as theoretically patients can be on any range of support. Higher values indicates that a patient is requiring a higher cardiovascular support at 24 hrs.
 VIS = dopamine (µg/kg/min) + dobutamine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × epinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × norepinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 10 × milrinone (µg/kg/min) + 10,000 × vasopressin (units/kg/min) + 50 × levosimendan (µg/kg/min)- 1R - 30 days - 1R is the rejection grade that referring to mild cellular rejection based on pathological assessment that is standardized by ISHLT. Generally, pathologist look for signs of mild cellular mediated damage (interstitial/perivascular inflammation) using special stains. Only participants with acute cellular rejection were assessed for this Outcome Measure - Antibody Mediated Rejection - 30 days - pAMR 1 - 30 days - pAMR1 is the rejection grade that referring to mild antibody rejection based on pathological assessment that is standardized by ISHLT. Generally, pathologist look for signs of mild antibody-mediated damage using special stains to detect the presence of immune complexes. 
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center 🇺🇸- Los Angeles, California, United States Cedars Sinai Medical Center🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
