Can You Reduce Problematic Smartphone Use Through a Group Intervention: A Single Case Experimental Design
- Conditions
- Addiction, Smartphone
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Problematic smart phone use course
- Registration Number
- NCT05384548
- Lead Sponsor
- Canterbury Christ Church University
- Brief Summary
This study will develop and conduct an initial, single-case, mixed-methods evaluation of a brief group intervention for mild and moderate problematic phone use.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 7
-Self-identifies as struggling with problematic smart phone use
- Actively experiencing suicidal or self-injurious thoughts, or have experienced these within the past year
- Already in a psychological therapy/intervention
- Planning a change of psychotropic medication during the research project.
- No access to video calling and/or slow internet connection speed
- A mental health condition that is not currently well managed/stable and therefore other interventions are likely to be more appropriate
- Does not own a smartphone that can record screen time
- Is not living in the UK, with access to services within the UK
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Problematic smart phone use course Problematic smart phone use course -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from pre-intervention (week 1) at post-intervention (week 10) on the Smartphone Addiction Scale -Short Version (SAS-SV). Post-intervention (week 10) This measures smartphone addiction producing a score between 10 and 60, with higher scores indicating greater levels of addiction.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from pre-intervention (week 1) at follow-up (week 18) on the Multicultural Quality of Life Index. Follow-up (week 18) This measures of quality of life, producing a score between 1 and 10, with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.
Change in daily subjective units of distress from the baseline period (weeks 0 and 1) to the follow-up period (weeks 17 to 18) Follow-up period (weeks 17 to 18) Single case analysis will compare daily subject units of distress ratings from the baseline period to the follow-up period. Separate daily ratings, on a 0 to 100 scale, will be obtained for each of anxiety, stress, low mood, and tiredness, with higher ratings indicating higher levels.
Change in daily phone use from the baseline period (weeks 0 and 1) to the intervention period (weeks 2 to 9) Intervention period (weeks 2 to 9) Single case analysis will compare daily phone use from the baseline period to the intervention period. Daily use will be measured by screentime (in minutes) and number of pick-ups.
Change from pre-intervention (week 1) at follow-up (week 18) on the Smartphone Addiction Scale -Short Version (SAS-SV). Follow-up (week 18) This measures smartphone addiction producing a score between 10 and 60, with higher scores indicating greater levels of addiction.
Change from pre-intervention (week 1) at follow-up (week 18) on the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale -21 item version (DASS-21). Follow-up (week 18) This measures levels of depression, anxiety and stress, producing a score between 0 for 42 each, with higher levels indicating greater severity.
Change in daily phone use from the baseline period (weeks 0 and 1) to the follow-up period (weeks 17 to 18) Follow-up period (weeks 17 to 18) Single case analysis will compare daily phone use from the baseline period to the follow-up period. Daily use will be measured by screentime (in minutes) and number of pick-ups.
Change from pre-intervention (week 1) at post-intervention (week 10) on the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale -21 item version (DASS-21). Post-intervention (week 10) This measures levels of depression, anxiety and stress, producing a score between 0 for 42 each, with higher levels indicating greater severity.
Change from pre-intervention (week 1) at post-intervention (week 10) on the Multicultural Quality of Life Index. Post-intervention (week 10) This measures of quality of life, producing a score between 1 and 10, with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.
Change in daily subjective units of distress from the baseline period (weeks 0 and 1) to the intervention period (weeks 2 to 9) Intervention period (weeks 2 to 9) Single case analysis will compare daily subject units of distress ratings from the baseline period to the intervention period. Separate daily ratings, on a 0 to 100 scale, will be obtained for each of anxiety, stress, low mood, and tiredness, with higher ratings indicating higher levels.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Salomons Institute, Canterbury Christ Church University
🇬🇧Tunbridge Wells, Kent, United Kingdom