MedPath

Can You Reduce Problematic Smartphone Use Through a Group Intervention: A Single Case Experimental Design

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Addiction, Smartphone
Interventions
Behavioral: Problematic smart phone use course
Registration Number
NCT05384548
Lead Sponsor
Canterbury Christ Church University
Brief Summary

This study will develop and conduct an initial, single-case, mixed-methods evaluation of a brief group intervention for mild and moderate problematic phone use.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
7
Inclusion Criteria

-Self-identifies as struggling with problematic smart phone use

Exclusion Criteria
  • Actively experiencing suicidal or self-injurious thoughts, or have experienced these within the past year
  • Already in a psychological therapy/intervention
  • Planning a change of psychotropic medication during the research project.
  • No access to video calling and/or slow internet connection speed
  • A mental health condition that is not currently well managed/stable and therefore other interventions are likely to be more appropriate
  • Does not own a smartphone that can record screen time
  • Is not living in the UK, with access to services within the UK

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Problematic smart phone use courseProblematic smart phone use course-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from pre-intervention (week 1) at post-intervention (week 10) on the Smartphone Addiction Scale -Short Version (SAS-SV).Post-intervention (week 10)

This measures smartphone addiction producing a score between 10 and 60, with higher scores indicating greater levels of addiction.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from pre-intervention (week 1) at follow-up (week 18) on the Multicultural Quality of Life Index.Follow-up (week 18)

This measures of quality of life, producing a score between 1 and 10, with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.

Change in daily subjective units of distress from the baseline period (weeks 0 and 1) to the follow-up period (weeks 17 to 18)Follow-up period (weeks 17 to 18)

Single case analysis will compare daily subject units of distress ratings from the baseline period to the follow-up period. Separate daily ratings, on a 0 to 100 scale, will be obtained for each of anxiety, stress, low mood, and tiredness, with higher ratings indicating higher levels.

Change in daily phone use from the baseline period (weeks 0 and 1) to the intervention period (weeks 2 to 9)Intervention period (weeks 2 to 9)

Single case analysis will compare daily phone use from the baseline period to the intervention period. Daily use will be measured by screentime (in minutes) and number of pick-ups.

Change from pre-intervention (week 1) at follow-up (week 18) on the Smartphone Addiction Scale -Short Version (SAS-SV).Follow-up (week 18)

This measures smartphone addiction producing a score between 10 and 60, with higher scores indicating greater levels of addiction.

Change from pre-intervention (week 1) at follow-up (week 18) on the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale -21 item version (DASS-21).Follow-up (week 18)

This measures levels of depression, anxiety and stress, producing a score between 0 for 42 each, with higher levels indicating greater severity.

Change in daily phone use from the baseline period (weeks 0 and 1) to the follow-up period (weeks 17 to 18)Follow-up period (weeks 17 to 18)

Single case analysis will compare daily phone use from the baseline period to the follow-up period. Daily use will be measured by screentime (in minutes) and number of pick-ups.

Change from pre-intervention (week 1) at post-intervention (week 10) on the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale -21 item version (DASS-21).Post-intervention (week 10)

This measures levels of depression, anxiety and stress, producing a score between 0 for 42 each, with higher levels indicating greater severity.

Change from pre-intervention (week 1) at post-intervention (week 10) on the Multicultural Quality of Life Index.Post-intervention (week 10)

This measures of quality of life, producing a score between 1 and 10, with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.

Change in daily subjective units of distress from the baseline period (weeks 0 and 1) to the intervention period (weeks 2 to 9)Intervention period (weeks 2 to 9)

Single case analysis will compare daily subject units of distress ratings from the baseline period to the intervention period. Separate daily ratings, on a 0 to 100 scale, will be obtained for each of anxiety, stress, low mood, and tiredness, with higher ratings indicating higher levels.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Salomons Institute, Canterbury Christ Church University

🇬🇧

Tunbridge Wells, Kent, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath