Comparing Review Of The Treatment Results Based On Surgical Or Nonsurgical Methods In The Patients With Fracture Of Proximal Humerus Referred to Al-Zahra And Kashani Hospitals (Isfahan )During 1388 -1392 (years)
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Proximal humerous fracture.Injury of axillary nerve, Injury of axillary arteryInjury of other nerves at shoulder and upper arm level, Injury of other blood vessels at shoulder and upper arm levelS44.3, S45
- Registration Number
- IRCT2013052313435N1
- Lead Sponsor
- Vice chancellor for research, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 114
Inclusion Criteria
Totally, 114 patients with proximal humerus fracture referred to the hospital universities in Isfahan (Ayatollah Kashani & Al Zahra hospitals) in 1388-1392. The age group was 30 to 80and
Exclusion criteria:
Pathologic fractures? Patient’s death during surgery or in 6 months later? non complete information registered by surgeon? last humerus surgery? humerus proximal fracture with dislocation
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method nion. Timepoint: The schedule (6weeks, 3month, 6months and one year)after intervention completed . Occurrence of each side effect was considered as a complication during one year of intervention happening. Method of measurement: The patients returned for trial check up during 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and one year after intervention . And self provided questionnaires were used to assess the consequences of the side effects. An AP/LAT auxillary view graphy was taken for each time and treatment flow was studied carefully and Treatment was based on the patient's condition.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Infection, delayed union, neurovascular problems, osteo necrosis, joints stiffness, loss of fixation and range of motion problems. Timepoint: The schedule (6weeks, 3month, 6months and one year) after intervention completed. Occurrence of each side effect was considered as a complication during one year of intervention happening. Method of measurement: The patients returned for trial check up during 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and one year after intervention. Self provided questionnaires were used to assess the consequences of the side effects. An AP/LAT auxillary view graphy was taken for each time and treatment flow was studied carefully and Treatment was based on the patient's condition.