MedPath

Clinical Utility of ESWT in Restoring Hand Function of Patients With Nerve Injury and Hypertrophic Scars Due to Burns

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Hand Injuries
Burns
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
Interventions
Other: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)
Other: sham stimulation
Registration Number
NCT06438224
Lead Sponsor
Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital
Brief Summary

Joint contractures and nerve injuries are common after hand burns. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is effective not only for the regeneration of various tissues, including scar tissues, but also for reducing pain and pruritus in patients with burns. Researchers have attempted to explore the effects of ESWT on hand dysfunction caused by nerve injury following burns. The investigators planned to evaluate the effects of ESWT (compared to sham stimulation) on hands with nerve injury and hypertrophic scars and thereby on hand function. The ESWT parameters were as follows: energy flux density, 0.05-0.30 mJ/mm2; frequency, 4 Hz; 1000 to 2000 impulses per treatment; and 12 treatments, one/week for 12 weeks. Outcome measures were as follows: 10-point visual analog scale for pain, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, grip strength, Purdue Pegboard test, ultrasound measurement of scar thickness, and skin characteristics before and immediately after 12 weeks of treatment.

Detailed Description

Burns that occur in the hand cause early joint range-of-motion (ROM) limitations and hand muscle weakness that significantly affect quality of life. Hand burns, though restricted to a small total body surface area (TBSA), can have significant functional consequences. Joint contractures and nerve injuries are common after hand burns. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is effective not only for the regeneration of various tissues, including scar tissues, but also for reducing pain and pruritus in patients with burns.

The investigators have attempted to explore the effects of ESWT on hand dysfunction caused by nerve injury following burns. The investigators planned to evaluate the effects of ESWT (compared to sham stimulation) on hands with nerve injury and hypertrophic scars and thereby on hand function. The ESWT parameters were as follows: energy flux density, 0.05-0.30 mJ/mm2; frequency, 4 Hz; 1000 to 2000 impulses per treatment; and 12 treatments, one/week for 12 weeks. Outcome measures were as follows: 10-point visual analog scale for pain, Jebsen-Taylor hand function test, grip strength, Purdue Pegboard test, ultrasound measurement of scar thickness, and skin characteristics before and immediately after 12 weeks of treatment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • ≥ 18 years old
  • had sustained a deep partial-thickness (second-degree) or a full-thickness (third-degree) burn in the right dominant hand, which had been treated with a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) after the thermal injury
  • nerve injury to the hand was confirmed by electromyography
  • < 6 months prior to the enrollment
Exclusion Criteria
  • musculoskeletal diseases (fracture, amputation, rheumatoid arthritis, and degenerative joint diseases) of the hands
  • acute infection
  • malignant tumors
  • coagulopathy
  • pregnancy
  • potential for additional skin damage if exposed to ESWT and conventional occupational therapy.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)Those in the ESWT group were asked to select the most hypertrophic and retracting scars for treatment. ESWT was conducted using the Duolith SD-1® device (StorzMedical, Tägerwilen, Switzerland), with an electromagnetic cylindrical coil source used to focus the shock wave. ESWT was performed around the primary treatment site, at an intensity of 100 impulses/cm2, an energy flux density (EFD) of 0.05 to 0.30 mJ/mm2, and frequency of 4 Hz. Regarding the volume of treatment, 1000-3000 impulses were administered per session for 12 sessions held at 1-week intervals.
sham groupsham stimulationthe sham group was treated using an adapter that had the same shape but did not emit any energy
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
10-point visual analog scale (VAS)12 weeks

self-reported pain severity, ratings ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Jebsen-Taylor hand function test (JTT)12 weeks

The JTT consists of seven subtests, each scored on a 0-15-point scale, with higher scores indicating better hand function

the total active motion (TAM) scoring system12 weeks

range of motion measurement, higher scores indicating better range of motion. For each finger, the maximum angle is 260 degrees and the minimum angle is 260 degrees.

Grip and pinch strengths12 weeks

quantified using a hand-held dynamometer (Lafayette Instrument, USA), with higher socres indicating more stronger

Scar thickness12 weeks

quantified using ultrasonography (128 BW1 US system, Medison, Korea)

Trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL)12 weeks

measured using a Tewameter® (Courage-Khazaka Electronic GmbH, Germany) to evaluate water evaporation. Higher values indicated skin dryness

pigmentation12 weeks

Mexameter®(MX18, Courage-Khazaka Electronics GmbH, Germany) was used to measure the severity of erythema. Higher values indicated redder skin.

erythema12 weeks

Mexameter®(MX18, Courage-Khazaka Electronics GmbH, Germany) was used to measure the melanin levels. Higher values indicated darker.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hangang sacred heart hodpital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath