The Effect of Hand Sewing Practices on Suturing Skills in Midwifery Students.

Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills

时间窗: All students will be asked to apply a simple running suture to the sponge after the intervention is completed. Evaluators will evaluate students using this form throughout the application (approximately 30 minutes).

It will be used to assess simple running suture skills. The form will include a checklist and a global rating scale. Each general performance criterion is scored from 1 to 5. Each step includes ratings such as "Cannot do," "Can do with little assistance," and "Can do easily." Each scale is scored from 1 to 5. This means the total score can range from 4 to 20. High scores on the scale indicate a good level of general technical skill.

Continue sutur skill evaluation form

时间窗: The researchers will monitor and complete the student's application as they complete it. The application will take approximately 30 minutes to complete. Students will be monitored throughout the process using this form (approximately 30 minutes).

This form was created by researchers. It contains 10 items. The items are on a 3-point Likert-type scale, ranging from "performed" to "incorrect" or "incomplete." Participants receive 2 points for performing the skill, 1 point for incomplete performance, and 0 points for not performing or performing it incorrectly. The total score ranges from 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate successful implementation.

Episiotomy Skills Self-Efficacy Scale

时间窗: It will be used as a pre-test 5 minutes after the standard training. It will be used as a post-test 5 minutes after students practice the simple running suture.

The Episiotomy Skills Self-Efficacy Scale (ESSES), developed by Hadımlı et al. (2023), was used to assess participants' self-efficacy perceptions regarding episiotomy application and repair. The scale consists of 17 items on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = Strongly disagree - 5 = Strongly agree). A two-factor structure (application and repair) was identified in the development study and was reported to explain 63.4% of the total variance. Turkish validity and reliability analyses were conducted within the scope of the same study, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was reported as 0.94.

Perceived Learning Scale

时间窗: It will be used as a pre-test 5 minutes after the standard training. It will be used as a post-test 5 minutes after students practice the simple running suture.

The Perceived Learning Scale, developed by Rovai et al. (2009), was used to measure students' cognitive, affective, and psychomotor perceptions of learning. The scale was adapted into Turkish by Albayrak, Güngören, and Horzum (2014). The Turkish form consists of nine items, and items 2 and 7 are reverse-scored. The scale is scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = Strongly disagree - 5 = Strongly agree), with higher scores indicating a stronger perception of learning.

Clinical Skills Self-Efficacy Scale

时间窗: It will be used as a pre-test 5 minutes after the standard training. It will be used as a post-test 5 minutes after students practice the simple running suture.

The Learning Self-Efficacy Scale for Clinical Skills (L-SES), developed by Bayazit, Gonullu, and Dogan (2022) and adapted to Turkish for validity and reliability, was used to assess self-efficacy perceptions related to clinical skills. The scale has a 14-item, single-factor structure and uses a 5-point Likert-type scoring system. The Turkish version's Cronbach's alpha was reported as 0.94.

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

时间窗: It will be used as a pre-test 5 minutes after the standard training. It will be used as a post-test 5 minutes after students practice the simple running suture.

The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), developed by Spielberger et al. (1983), was used to measure participants' state and trait anxiety levels, along with a form adapted for Turkish by Öner and Le Compte (1985). Two subscales, each consisting of 20 items (STAI-1 = State Anxiety, STAI-2 = Trait Anxiety), are scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale. The total score is calculated by correcting for reverse items.