Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03774550
NCT03774550
Completed
Not Applicable

A Comparison of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation With or Without Contact-force and Cryoablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville1 site in 1 country206 target enrollmentJanuary 25, 2019

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Atrial Fibrillation
Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
Enrollment
206
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Atrial Fibrillation survival
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The study aims to compare 3 techniques routinely used for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: radiofrequency catheter ablation without contact-force, radiofrequency catheter ablation with contact-force and cryoablation. The hypothesis is the non-inferiority between the 3 techniques in terms of free-from atrial fibrillation survival (primary criteria). It will also compare lenght of procedure, radioscopy time and immediate complications (secondary criteria).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 25, 2019
End Date
May 1, 2019
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients who had an atrial fibrillation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs, between 01/01/2014 and 30/09/2017 in CHR Metz-Thionville

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients not willing to participate via using their medical files

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Atrial Fibrillation survival

Time Frame: Day 1

Free from atrial fibrillation survival

Secondary Outcomes

  • Immediate complications(Day 1)
  • Radioscopy duration(Day 1)
  • Lenght of procedure(Day 1)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials