Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06374680
NCT06374680
Withdrawn
Not Applicable

Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of Radiological and Axial Pain Outcome Between C3-6 Laminoplasty and C3 Laminectomy With Cervical Laminoplasty

Seoul National University Hospital1 site in 1 countryStarted: March 20, 2017Last updated:
ConditionsNeck Pain

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Withdrawn
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
neck pain

Overview

Brief Summary

  1. Background In cervical stenosis, cervical laminoplasty from the third to sixth cervical vertebrae is widely used. However, the muscles attached to the C2, which play an important role in the movement of our neck, are frequently damaged during the C3 laminoplasty. In contrast, cervical spine surgery through the removal of the C3 is thought to give less damage to the muscles attached to the C2.
  2. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the prospective randomized comparison of these two surgical methods.
  3. Hypothesis There is no difference in the cervical length and overall cervical angle between 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively between C3 laminectomy with C4-6 laminoplasty and C3-6 laminoplasty.

Detailed Description

Surgery is performed under general anesthesia as before, followed by posterior cervical incision. In one group, the cervical spine of the C3 is removed using a drill and punch and C4-6 laminoplasty will be performed. In the other group, C3-6 laminoiplasty will be performed. Postoperative suturing and subject management are the same as existing patient care policies. Follow-up is performed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 1 year after surgery at the outpatient clinic and x-ray is taken at each outpatient follow-up. The degree of the neck pain is measured using NDI and VAS for each outpatient f/u.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • cervical stenosis

Exclusion Criteria

  • metastatic tumor
  • previous cervical spine surgery (posterior approach)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

neck pain

Time Frame: 1 year

Numerical rating pain score on neck, 0\~10, 0 is no pain, 10 is maximum pain

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Chun Kee Chung

professor

Seoul National University Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials