se of soft-tissue substitutes in the treatment of exposed rooth tooth

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Tooth abrasion; C07.465.714.258.447

• Registration Number: RBR-106mfmx6
• Lead Sponsor: niversidade Federal de Uberlândia

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2021-12-02
• Last Update Posted: 5 March 2024
• Study Completion: 2024-05-31

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Recruitment completed
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: Not specified

Inclusion Criteria

Present a single or multiple gingival recessions classified as RT1 (Miller class I and II) that require surgical treatment; Lack of previous experience with surgical treatment to treat gingival recessions; Ability to maintain good oral hygiene; Presence of non-carious cervical lesions associated with at least one of the gingival recessions; Being systemically healthy or having compensated systemic diseases; Present age between 18-60 years old.

Exclusion Criteria

History of untreated periodontal disease; Cigarette consumption greater than 10 units per day; Furcation lesion on the tooth to be treated; Presence of severe crowding, rotation or poor positioning of the tooth to be treated; Hypersensitivity to any anesthetic, medication or antiseptic product used in surgery; Medical limitation for elective surgical procedures; Pregnant or lactating women.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Intervention
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Evaluate the vertical coverage of the exposed root surface and percentage of root coverage, considering that one treatment will be superior to the other if there is more than 1 mm of root coverage or more than 20% of root coverage percentage.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Evaluate the probing depth and the clinical attachment level considering that one treatment will be superior to the other if the probing depth is reduced by 1 mm and the clinical insertion level increased by 1 mm.;Evaluate the thickness of the keratinized mucosa and the height of the keratinized mucosa, considering that one treatment will be superior to the other if there is an increase in the thickness of the mucosa by 0.5mm and an increase in the height of the mucosa of the keratinized mucosa by 1 mm.;Evaluate aesthetics through a score in which one treatment will be superior to the other if there are differences of at least 3 points in that score.;Evaluate the surgery time as one treatment will be superior to the other if you reduce the surgery time by 5 minutes.