The comparison of three different techniques for the treatment of gum and bone diseases of behind teeth in the mouth
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Mandibular molars with Class II buccal furcation defects (Hamp et.al. 1975)
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/03/012621
- Lead Sponsor
- Manipal college of dental sciences Manipal Academy of Higher Education MAHE Mangalore
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 24
Inclusion Criteria
1.Patients age 20 and more irrespective of gender.
2.Mandibular molars with Class II buccal furcation defects (Hamp et.al. 1975)34
3.Vertical Clinical attachment loss of >=4mm after initial therapy.
4.Adequate gingival biotype of >=1mm.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Tobacco consumption of any type.
2.Immunocompromised individuals.
3.Patients with compromised systemic health and contraindicated for periodontal surgery.
4.History of previous periodontal surgery performed at the site of interest in the past 24 months.
5.Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.
6.Pregnant or lactating females.
7.Third molars with furcation involvement.
8.Untreated non-vital teeth.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method i.Vertical probing pocket depth (VPPD) <br/ ><br>ii.Horizontal probing depth (HPD) <br/ ><br>iii.Probing Clinical attachment level (PCAL)Timepoint: Baseline and six months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method i. Gingival Recession (GR) <br/ ><br>ii. Radiographic furcation depth (RFD)Timepoint: Baseline and six months