Measurement-based Care vs. Standard Care for Major Depressive Disorder: a Randomized Controlled Trial With Masked Raters
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 164
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- The estimated time from randomization to response and remission according to Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) total score.
研究概览
简要总结
In recent years, measurement-based care (MBC) has been gaining more attention in the treatment of depression because it allows psychiatrists to individualize treatment decisions for each patient based on the change of psychopathology and tolerance toward antidepressants. Several studies, such as the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial using MBC, found that MBC-informed sequential algorithms can be successfully integrated into clinical practice and improve patients' outcomes However, despite a strong theoretical rationale for MBC and data supporting the ability to implement MBC in clinical practice settings, there is currently no randomized controlled trial in MDD patients comparing MBC with usual/standard care. The investigators compare MBC with clinician's treatment decisions, standardizing care to two commonly prescribed antidepressants.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the effects of MBC in patients with MDD compared to standard treatment (ST). The research hypothesis is that compared to ST, the estimated time to response and to remission would be significantly shorter in the MBC group without increased dropout rates and side effect burden.
详细描述
Objective
To compare the effectiveness and feasibility of the measurement-based care (MBC) in the treatment of depression with clinician's treatment decisions, standardizing treatment (ST, clinicians' choice decisions) to two commonly prescribed antidepressants.
Methods: Selecting the patients in psychiatric hospitals and general hospitals with depression, with multi-center randomized controlled study design. Refer to STAR-D "measurement-based care" mode, to establish the whole measurement-based evaluation system. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to 24 weeks of MBC or ST, restricting treatment to paroxetine (20-60mg/day) or mirtazapine (15-45mg/day) in both groups. the ST group will maximize simulate of the actual clinical situation, and the patients of the MBC group are required to complete the prospective Life-chart Methodology (LCM-p), 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR16) and other related symptoms and side effects of self-assessment, the doctor will make a comprehensive assessment according to the results of self-assessment, adjust treatment according to research programs. This is 1-year follow-up study; the independent members will have a blinded assessment in the baseline visit and each point of view. Depressive symptoms are measured using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) and QIDS-SR.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Factorial
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •age 18-65 years;
- •outpatients;
- •diagnosis of non-psychotic MDD established by treating psychiatrists and confirmed by a checklist based on DSM-IV criteria at study entry ;
- •total score of HAMD-17≥17;
- •ability to communicate and provide written consent.
排除标准
- •current or past history of drug and alcohol dependence, bipolar, psychotic, obsessive-compulsive, or eating disorders;
- •history of lack of response or intolerance to any of the two protocol antidepressants (paroxetine or mirtazapine);
- •being pregnant or breast-feeding;
- •suicide attempts in the current depressive episode or major medical conditions contraindicating the use of the protocol antidepressants.
研究组 & 干预措施
measurement-based care
MBC allows psychiatrists to individualize treatment decisions for each patient based on the change of psychopathology and tolerance toward antidepressants. Treatment decisions were made by treating psychiatrists according to ratings of self-report scales obtained at each treatment visit. Paroxetine was started at 20mg/day and then raised to 30mg/day by week 4, 40mg/day by week 6, 50mg/day by week 8 and 60mg/day by week 10. Mirtazapine was started at 15mg/day and raised to 30mg/day by week 1 and 45mg/day by week 4. Dose adjustments were dependent on how long a patient had received a particular dose, symptom changes and side effects.
干预措施: Paroxetine (Drug)
measurement-based care
MBC allows psychiatrists to individualize treatment decisions for each patient based on the change of psychopathology and tolerance toward antidepressants. Treatment decisions were made by treating psychiatrists according to ratings of self-report scales obtained at each treatment visit. Paroxetine was started at 20mg/day and then raised to 30mg/day by week 4, 40mg/day by week 6, 50mg/day by week 8 and 60mg/day by week 10. Mirtazapine was started at 15mg/day and raised to 30mg/day by week 1 and 45mg/day by week 4. Dose adjustments were dependent on how long a patient had received a particular dose, symptom changes and side effects.
干预措施: Mirtazapine (Drug)
Standard treatment
Patients in the ST group are treated by their psychiatrists according to their clinical needs as judged at each outpatient visit, receiving either open-label paroxetine (20-60mg/day) or mirtazapine (15-45mg/day) within the therapeutic dose range.
干预措施: Paroxetine (Drug)
Standard treatment
Patients in the ST group are treated by their psychiatrists according to their clinical needs as judged at each outpatient visit, receiving either open-label paroxetine (20-60mg/day) or mirtazapine (15-45mg/day) within the therapeutic dose range.
干预措施: Mirtazapine (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
The estimated time from randomization to response and remission according to Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) total score.
时间窗: From randomization to response and remission (24 week))
Response was defined as ≥50% decrease in the baseline HAMD total score; remission was defined as the HAMD total score ≤7
次要结局
- The incidence and nature of overall adverse events(From enrollment to endpoint (Week 24))
- The changes of Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR) total score(From randomization to endpoint (Week 24))
- The changes of Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) total score(From randomization to endpoint (Week 24))
- The number of subject withdrawal due to adverse events during double-blind phase(From randomization to endpoint(Week 24))
- The incidence and nature of drug-related adverse events(From enrollment to endpoint (Week 24))
- The changes of Frequency, Intensity, and Burden of Side Effects-Rating (FIBSER)(From randomization to endpoint (Week 24))
研究者
Gang Wang
vice-director of Affective Disorder Center, Beijing Anding Hospital
Capital Medical University