Improving HPV Vaccination Delivery in Pediatric Primary Care: The STOP-HPV Trial 1. Comparison of Communication Skills and Standard of Care for Uptake of the HPV Vaccine
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Immunization
- Sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Enrollment
- 48
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in the Rate of Missed Vaccination Opportunities Among All Clinicians
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
Most adolescents who receive human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine are vaccinated in pediatric practices, yet missed opportunities (MOs) for HPV vaccination occur often and lead to low HPV vaccination rates. This cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT) will test the effectiveness (and cost-effectiveness) of training providers on HPV vaccine communication to reduce MOs and increase HPV vaccination rates.
Detailed Description
As highlighted by NCI, low HPV vaccination rates represent a major lost opportunity for population-wide cancer prevention. Pediatric primary care office visits are the main site for HPV vaccination, yet many missed opportunities (MOs) for vaccination occur in primary care and contribute to low vaccination rates. MOs are office visits during which a patient is eligible for a vaccine, but does not receive it. Many factors cause MOs - provider factors (e.g., time-constrained visits, lack of communication skills, and giving vaccinations only at preventive visits) and parent factors (e.g., vaccine hesitancy). This cluster randomized clinical trial will test the effectiveness (and cost-effectiveness) of training providers in HPV vaccine communication to reduce MOs and increase HPV vaccination rates. This training will be done through online educational modules (sent via text or email), weekly mini lessons and live office practice sessions.
Investigators
Peter G Szilagyi, MD MPH
Professor of Pediatrics, Executive Vice-Chair and Vice-Chair for Research, Department of Pediatrics
University of California, Los Angeles
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •The practice provides HPV vaccination services to adolescents.
- •The practice is part of Physician's Computer Company (PCC), Office Practicum (OP) or (a) yet-to-be selected health system(s).
- •The practice has had the same EHR system in place for a year or more (with special consideration on a case by case basis if they are close to but not do not reach a year).
- •The practice agrees to not participate in other HPV-related QI projects or research interventions during the study period (with special consideration on a case by case basis).
Exclusion Criteria
- •The practice plans to change EHR systems in the next three years.
- •The practice participated in the last year, is currently engaged in, or plans to participate in an office-based HPV-related quality improvement (QI) project or research intervention during the study period (with special consideration on a case by case basis).
- •Estimated 20% or more of adolescents at the practice receive HPV vaccinations at schools or health department clinics (given standard practice and published data, the investigators expect that few to no practices will need to be excluded based on this restriction).
- •Patient inclusion criteria:
- •All patients of participating practices (intervention and comparison) aged 11-17 years who have at least 1 visit to the practice within the past two years.
- •Patient exclusion criteria:
- •None apart from age of patients (above).
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in the Rate of Missed Vaccination Opportunities Among All Clinicians
Time Frame: Assessment of rates from 2 time periods- baseline period (assessed outcomes retrospectively from minus 12 months to Time 0), followed by 6 month intervention period (excluding a 4 week ramp-up period).
The difference in the missed opportunity rate for HPV vaccination between the baseline period (12 months long) and the feedback period (6 months long) among all the clinicians in the participating practices, regardless of whether they received the training intervention. A missed opportunity is a visit-based measure, with the denominator representing all the visits where an HPV vaccine is due at the time of the visit and the numerator representing the number of visits where an HPV vaccine was not given.
Change in the Rate of Missed Vaccination Opportunities Among Consenting Clinicians
Time Frame: Assessment of rates from 2 time periods- baseline period (assessed outcomes retrospectively from minus 12 months to Time 0), followed by 6 month intervention period (excluding a 4 week ramp-up period).
The difference in the missed opportunity rate for HPV vaccination between the baseline period (12 months long) and the feedback period (6 months long) among all the clinicians in the participating practices who received the training intervention. A missed opportunity is a visit-based measure, with the denominator representing all the visits where an HPV vaccine is due at the time of the visit and the numerator representing the number of visits where an HPV vaccine was not given.