MedPath

Comparison of Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy in Pediatric Airway Management

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Videolaryngoscopy
Airway Management
Interventions
Device: direct laryngoscopy
Device: King Vision aBlade
Registration Number
NCT03571295
Lead Sponsor
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Brief Summary

The investigators intended to evaluate first success rate and learning curve of trainee anesthetists performing direct and videolaryngoscopy in pediatric airway management.

Detailed Description

After obtaining written informed consent of 10 trainee anesthetists with non less than 24 months and not exceeding 60 months residency, use of the King Vision aBlade videolaryngoscope was demonstrated by presenting a 2 min instruction video. First endotracheal intubation by each trainee anesthetist was randomly allocated to either direct (DL) or King Vision aBlade videolaryngoscopy (KingVL). Then order of laryngoscopy type was alternating at least each trainee anesthetists performed 10 DL and 10 KingVL endotracheal intubations.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
210
Inclusion Criteria
  • ASA 1 to 2
  • written informed consent from both legal guardians
  • children who were scheduled for nonemergency surgery with requirement of endotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
  • known or predicted difficult airway
  • increased risk for pulmonary aspiration

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
direct laryngoscopydirect laryngoscopy-
videolaryngoscopyKing Vision aBlade-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
first attempt success rate of endotracheal intubationoperation day

yes/no

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
total time for successful intubationoperation day

in sec

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Johannes Gutenberg - Universität

🇩🇪

Mainz, Rhineland Palatinate, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath