MedPath

Implant Stability Changes In Dental Implants Installed By Osseodensification and Conventional Methods

Not Applicable
Conditions
Dental Implant Stability
Interventions
Other: dental implant placement
Registration Number
NCT05390996
Lead Sponsor
University of Baghdad
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Osseodensification on implant stability during the healing period The objective of this study is to compare between dental implant stability after osteotomy site preparation using osseodensification technique and conventional drilling technique immediately after implant installation (primary stability) , 6 week after the insertion of implant and 12 weeks later (secondary stability)

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
35
Inclusion Criteria
  1. medically fit patients ≥ 18 years of age including both genders
  2. alveolar ridges of sufficient vertical and horizontal dimensions
  3. bone density less than 850 Hounsfield units (HU) which corresponds to D3-D5 bone density according to Misch bone classification based on preoperative CBCT findings
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patients with high bone density (more than 850 HU which corresponds to D1 and D2 according to Misch classification are not suitable for osseodensification.
  2. Patient with severe buccal plate undercut or concavity
  3. Active infection or inflammation in the implant zone
  4. Presence of any uncontrolled systemic diseases.
  5. Any patient need advance treatment such as sinus lifting and bone augmentation.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
conventional drilling techniquedental implant placementcontrol group
condensation drilling techniquedental implant placementcondensation of bone (osseodensefecation technique)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
secondary stability12 week post surgery

Mean implant stability between different comparators following implants insertion by using resonance frequency analysis scaled from 1 to 100

primary stability0 day (baseline)

Mean implant stability between different comparators following implants insertion by using resonance frequency analysis scaled from 1 to 100

stability at the dip period6 week post surgery

Mean implant stability between different comparators following implants insertion by using resonance frequency analysis scaled from 1 to 100

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Baghdad University

🇮🇶

Baghdad, Babalmatham, Iraq

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath