Predictive Models for Betalactam Allergy
- Conditions
- Drug Hypersensitivity
- Registration Number
- NCT03076749
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Montpellier
- Brief Summary
Background: ß-lactam (BL) antibiotics represent the main cause of allergic reactions to drugs, inducing both immediate and non-immediate reactions. The diagnosis is well established, usually based upon skin tests and drug provocation tests, but cumbersome.
Objectives: To design predictive models for the diagnosis of BL allergy, based on the clinical history of patients with suspicions of allergic reactions to BL.
Methods: The study included a retrospective phase in which records of patients consulting and explored for a suspicion of BL allergy (in the Allergy Unit of the University Hospital of Montpellier between September 1996 and September 2012) where used to construct predictive models; a prospective phase, in which we performed an external validation of the chosen models, in patients with suspicion of BL allergy recruited from 3 allergy centres (Montpellier, Nîmes, Narbonne), between March and November 2013. Data related to clinical history and allergy work-up results were retrieved and analysed. Logistic regression and decision tree method were used to design two models to predict the diagnosis of allergy to BL.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1200
- Patients seen in consultation in allergology department for suspicion of allergy to beta lactamines
- patient refusal to take part in the study
- pregnancy
- breast feeding women
- contraindication to provocation test
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Provocation test 18 months Results of provocation test for allergy diagnosis
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Questionnaire SF36 18 months Questionnaire SF36 will be compared to provocation test results
Questionnaire ENDA 18 months Questionnaire ENDA will be compared to provocation test results