Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/EUCTR2007-007742-35-DE
EUCTR2007-007742-35-DE
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable

A double-blind, double-dummy, prospective, randomized multiple-site study of oral Finafloxacin 300 mg b.i.d. versus oral Ciprofloxacin 250 mg b.i.d. in patients with lower uncomplicated UTI (uUTI) with a treatment duration of 3 days. - FLUT

MerLion Pharmaceuticals GmbH0 sites48 target enrollmentMarch 25, 2008

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
ower uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection
Sponsor
MerLion Pharmaceuticals GmbH
Enrollment
48
Status
Active, not recruiting
Last Updated
13 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
March 25, 2008
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
13 years ago
Study Type
Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
Sex
Female

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 1\.Female patients between 18 and 55 years with uUTI.
  • 2\.Two of the following sign and symptoms of uUTI: dysuria, frequency, urgency, miction pain, suprapubic pain, gross hematuria, turbid urine or malodorous urine.
  • 3\.Able to supply a mid\-stream, clean catch urine sample for microbiological analysis.
  • 4\.The result of the dipstick should indicate a high probability of the required number of bacteria.
  • 5\.Be able to communicate with the study personnel.
  • 6\.Has given written consent to participate in the study.
  • Are the trial subjects under 18? no
  • Number of subjects for this age range:
  • F.1\.2 Adults (18\-64 years) yes
  • F.1\.2\.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion Criteria

  • 1\.Female patients having signs and symptoms of upper urinary tract infection (e.g. fever, flank pain) indicating complicated UTI.
  • 2\.Male patients
  • 3\.History or evidence of other functional or anatomical abnormalities of the urinary tract (e.g. acute pyelonephritis), diabetes mellitus and immunosuppresion.
  • 4\.Recurrent cystitis with more than 3 episodes in the past 12 months.
  • 5\.Clinical symptoms for more than 7 days before Baseline.
  • 6\.Psychiatric, neurological or behaviour disorders.
  • 7\.Clinically significant serious unstable physical illness.
  • 8\.Known uncontrolled condition of hypertension or symptomatic hypotension, known ischemic heart disease or history of myocardial infarction (within 12 months prior study enrolment), coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
  • 9\.Existence of any surgical or medical condition which might interfere with the distribution, metabolism or excretion of the drug, i.e. impaired renal or hepatic function, diabetes mellitus, chronic symptoms of pronounced constipation or diarrhea or conditions associated with total or partial obstruction of the urinary tract.
  • 10\.Antibiotic intake 2 weeks before study enrolment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Completed
Phase 3
A prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial to compare pain relief from intravenous paracetamol and oral paracetamol in acute pain patients presenting to the Emergency DepartmentPainInjuries and Accidents - Other injuries and accidentsAnaesthesiology - Pain management
ACTRN12615000481572The Townsville Hospital and Health Service100
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
This study aims to find out how effective and save Angocin Anti-Infekt N is in treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis in contrast to standard antibiotics.Treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitisMedDRA version: 14.1Level: PTClassification code 10011781Term: CystitisSystem Organ Class: 10021881 - Infections and infestationsTherapeutic area: Diseases [C] - Bacterial Infections and Mycoses [C01]
EUCTR2010-022096-54-DERepha GmbH
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A Clinical Study to compare the Effects of Cilnidipine 10 mg Tablet versus Amlodipine 10 mg Tablet in Patients of Newly Diagnosed Hypertension.
CTRI/2022/04/042233Dr Amey Beedkar
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active controlled, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of the combination BAY 60 4552 / vardenafil compared to vardenafil (20 mg) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction not sufficiently responsive to standard therapy with PDE5 inhibitors
EUCTR2010-020122-18-FIBayer HealthCare AG267
Completed
Phase 2
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active controlled, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of the combination BAY 60 4552 / vardenafil compared to vardenafil (20 mg) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction not sufficiently responsive to standard therapy with PDE5 inhibitors
NL-OMON34486Bayer30