MedPath

A Phase 3 Multi-center Study to Assess PET Imaging of Flurpiridaz F 18 Injection in Patients With CAD.

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
Interventions
Drug: 99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin)
Registration Number
NCT01347710
Lead Sponsor
Lantheus Medical Imaging
Brief Summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the diagnostic efficacy (specificity and sensitivity) of flurpiridaz F18 injection PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) compared to single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPI in the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) as defined by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or a documented history of Myocardial Infarction (MI).

Detailed Description

The study will assess the diagnostic efficacy (sensitivity and specificity) of Flurpiridaz F18 Injection MPI against SPECT MPI in patients screened for CAD as determined by ICA. Six hundred and eighty evaluable patients will be enrolled and will undergo SPECT MPI and Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI. Patients will be considered for enrollment if they are scheduled to undergo or have undergone prior ICA without intervention (being either positive or negative for CAD).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
795
Inclusion Criteria

Invasive Coronary Angiography. Men or Women age 18 or older - see protocol for additional details.

Exclusion Criteria

Women who are pregnant, lactating, or of child bearing potential who are not practicing birth control.

Unstable cardiac status. History of coronary artery bypass graft. History of percutaneous coronary intervention within the past six months. See protocol for additional details.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Flurpiridaz F18Flurpiridaz F18Open-label study of a single dose of Flurpiridaz F18 injection for PET MPI compared to a single dose of 99mTc sestamibi or tetrofosmin for SPECT MPI in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease referred for coronary catheterization
Flurpiridaz F1899mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin)Open-label study of a single dose of Flurpiridaz F18 injection for PET MPI compared to a single dose of 99mTc sestamibi or tetrofosmin for SPECT MPI in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease referred for coronary catheterization
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F 18 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) Sensitivity Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Sensitivity60 days

Diagnostic efficacy of one day rest and stress flurpiridaz F 18 PET MPI sensitivity versus SPECT MPI sensitivity in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) by majority rule using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard,

Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz PET MPI Specificity Versus SPECT MPI Specificity60 days

Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz PET MPI specificity versus SPECT MPI specificity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI Sensitivity Versus SPECT MPI Sensitivity in Subgroups: Pharmacologic Stress, Females and BMI>/=30.60 days

Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI sensitivity versus SPECT MPI sensitivity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard, , in subgroups: pharmacologic stress, females and BMI \>/=30. Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard

I

Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI Specificity Versus SPECT Specificity in Subgroups: Pharmacologic Stress, Females and BMI>/=30.60 days

Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI specificity versus SPECT specificity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard, in subgroups: pharmacologic stress, females and BMI \>/=30. Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard

Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Localization of CAD for Sensitivity (PETVsSPECT).60 days

Overall sensitivity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI in coronary territories (Qualitative Diagnosis vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard (angiographic stenosis greater than or equal to 50% stenosis and confirmed MI); left descending coronary artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), right coronary artery (RCA), and non - LAD. Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard

Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Localization of CAD for Specificity (PETVsSPECT).60 days

Overall specificity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI in Coronary Territories (Qualitative Diagnosis) vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard (angiographic stenosis greater than or equal to 50% stenosis and confirmed MI); left descending coronary artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), right coronary artery (RCA), and non - LAD. Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard

Diagnositic Performance Evaluation of Multivessel Disease (PETvsSPECT).60 days

Overall summary of specificity for identifying multi-vessel disease between flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. majority rule (angio \>/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard

Overall Summary of Sensitivity of PET MPI vs SPECT MPI; Image Quality Excellent or Good60 days

Overall summary of sensitivity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI (qualitative image quality of excellent or good) vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard(angio \>/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard

Overall Summary of Specificity of PET MPI vs SPECT MPI; Image Quality of Excellent or Good60 days

Overall summary of specificity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI (qualitative, image quality excellent or good) vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs truth standard (angio \>/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard

Image Quality of Rest and Stress (PET vs SPECT).60 days

Overall summary of rest and stress image quality for flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule. Value represents the number of subject images evaluated as excellent/good and fair/poor

Diagnostic Certainty in PET MPI and SPECT MPI60 days

Overall summary of diagnostic certainty in flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule

Trial Locations

Locations (81)

Cardiology Associates of Mobile, Inc.

🇺🇸

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd.

🇺🇸

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

West Side Medical Associates of Los Angeles

🇺🇸

Beverly Hills, California, United States

USC PET Imaging Science Center

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

VA West Los Angeles Medical Center

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

UCLA

🇺🇸

Los Angeles, California, United States

Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System

🇺🇸

Palo Alto, California, United States

Cardiovascular Consultants Medical Group

🇺🇸

Pleasant Hill, California, United States

Northern California PET Imaging Center-Palo Alto

🇺🇸

Sacramento, California, United States

Scroll for more (71 remaining)
Cardiology Associates of Mobile, Inc.
🇺🇸Mobile, Alabama, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.