Hip Abductor Tendon Repair Versus Sham Surgery
- Conditions
- Rupture of Hip Abductor Tendon (Disorder)
- Interventions
- Procedure: Surgical reconstruction of hip abductor tendon tearProcedure: Sham surgery of hip abductor tendon tear
- Registration Number
- NCT06398015
- Lead Sponsor
- Horsens Hospital
- Brief Summary
This study will examine the effectiveness of open surgical reconstruction in the treatment of patients with hip abductor tendon tears. Patients will be randomly allocated to either the open surgical reconstruction or to a open surgical sham procedure. The primary outcome is patient reported pain measured by the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), which will be conducted pre-surgery and at three and six months post-surgery. The six-month follow-up is the primary endpoint.
- Detailed Description
This is a study protocol for a Good Clinical Practice-monitored, double-blinded, randomized, controlled superiority trial with two groups, where the primary endpoint is differences in changes in lateral hip pain 6 months post-surgery. If included in the study, patients will be randomly allocated to one of the two arms:
1. Open surgical reconstruction of the hip abductor tear (rHAT-group)
2. Sham surgery (SHAM-group)
Patients will be allocated with a 1:1 ratio using permuted blocks with random varying sizes of 4, 6, and 8. An interim analysis will be performed when 8 patients in each group have completed the primary outcome assessment at 6 months.
Post-surgery, the patients in both groups will be guided and instructed in exercises according to their pain levels and functional capacity by an experienced physiotherapist blinded to the allocation. The first 6 post-surgery weeks, rehabilitation is home-based. After the 6-week follow-up, the patients will be referred to further rehabilitation in their home municipality (current standard practice).
The patients will be assessed pre-surgery, at 3 months post-surgery, and at the final follow-up at 6 months post-surgery. A physiotherapist blinded to the allocation will test the patients at the abovementioned timepoints.
In the trial paper all outcomes conducted will be published. That is, the primary outcome and the following secondary outcomes: The remaining five subscales of the revised HAGOS questionnaire (symptoms, function in daily living, function in sport and recreation, participation in physical activity, quality of life), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), European Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS), Global Rating of Change (GroC), Lateral hip pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS), The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Gluteal Questionnaire (VISA-G), isometric hip abduction muscle strength, functional capacity by a 30 second Chair Stand Test (30s-CST).
The primary aim is to evaluate between-group changes on hip pain based on the subscale "pain" from the patient-reported outcome measure the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) from pre-surgery to 6 months post-surgery.
Primarily The primary hypothesis: The score in the subscale "pain" on the revised HAGOS will increase more in the intervention group compared to the control group, 6 months post-surgery.
A full study protocol will be published and made available.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 36
- Patients with an MRI verified hip abductor tendon pathology
- Age 30 years or above
- Lateral hip pain for more than 12 months
- Ability to understand written and verbal Danish
- Previous hip joint replacement, pelvic osteomies, hip abductor tendon surgery, femoral nailing or iliotibial band surgery
- Pregnancy
- Osteoarthritis of the hip joint on the affected side (Kellgren Lawrence grade +2)
- Rheumatoid disorders
- Inability to attend planned follow-up visits
- Having an ongoing occupational injury insurance case
- Expected lack of compliance due to cognitive issues, alcohol, or drug abuse
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description rHat-group Surgical reconstruction of hip abductor tendon tear Surgical reconstruction of hip abductor tendon tear SHAM-group Sham surgery of hip abductor tendon tear Sham surgery of hip abductor tendon tear
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Differences in changes in patient-reported pain measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data) From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up. The subscale "pain" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain. It consist of ten items. A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating lower pain.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Differences in changes in patient-reported symptoms measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data) From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up. The subscale "symptoms" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain. It consist of seven items. A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating lower symptoms.
Differences in changes in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data) From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up. The subscale "QOL" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain. It consist of five items. A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating higher quality of life.
Differences in changes in the patient-reported outcome measure Oxford Hip Score (continuous data) From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up. Oxford Hip Score (OHS), which consists of 12items. OHS is developed and validated for patients undergoing total hip replacements to access pain and function. It is a composite score ranging from 0 (worst) to 48 (best).
Differences in changes in the patient-reported outcome measure EQ-5D-5L (continuous data) From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up. European Questionnaire-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS) consists of five items and a visual analogue score (VAS), a vertical line on which the patients score their perception of their overall health from 0 to 100 (worst to best)
Differences in changes in patient-reported physical function in sport and recreational activities (sport/recreation) measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data) From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up. The subscale "sport/recreation" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain. It consist of eight items. A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating higher function.
Differences in changes of the number of repetitions of a 30 second sit to stand test (continuous data) From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up. Number of repetitions (sits to stand) performed during 30 seconds on a chair with a seat height of 46 cm.
Differences in changes in patient-reported participation in physical activities (PA) measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data) From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up. The subscale "PA" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain. It consist of two items. A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating higher ability to participate in physical activity.
Global Rating of Change (GRoC) The outcome is conducted at 3- and 6-months post-surgery follow-up. GRoC consists of a 11-point scale, where the patient rates the perceived overall change of the hip condition from "very much better" to "very much worse" . Responses on GRoC will be considered successful if patients scored "moderately better" to "very much better". Global improvement will be measured as the percentage of successful reports.
Differences in changes in the patient-reported outcome measure The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Gluteal Questionnaire (VISA-G) (continuous data) From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Gluteal Questionnaire (VISA-G) is validated for patients with gluteal tendinopathy and measures the severity of disability related to the condition. VISA-G consist of eight items and appraise the pain in relation to gluteal tendinopathy by a score from 0-100, where a higher score will indicate lower pain and less disability.
Differences in changes in patient-reported physical function in daily living (ADL) measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data) From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up. The subscale "ADL" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain. It consist of five items. A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating higher function.
Differences in changes in lateral hip pain on a numerical pain rating scale (NRS) From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up. Participants rate their pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable). Participants will rate their average pain for the past 14 days during rest and activity.
Differences in changes of maximal isometric hip abduction muscle strength (continuous data) From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up. Maximal isometric hip abduction strength test measures the maximal voluntary isometric contraction in supine position. The strength will be measured using a fixed dynamometer. Strength will be conducted in Newton, but will be normalised according to the lever arm and body weight, and will be reported as Nm/kg bodyweight.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Horsens Regional Hospital
🇩🇰Horsens, Denmark