Clinical Efectivity of Two Different Sensor-augmented Pumps With Low Predictive Suspension Function
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Interventions
- Device: TTSX2Device: MM640G
- Registration Number
- NCT04741685
- Lead Sponsor
- Castilla-La Mancha Health Service
- Brief Summary
Observational cross-sectional multicenter study about effectiveness of two different sensor augmented-pumps with low glucose predictive function in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) adult patients in routine clinical practice.
- Detailed Description
Cross-sectional multicenter analysis about clinical effectiveness of two different sensor-augmented pumps, Tandem T Slim X2 with Basal IQ (TTSX2) and Medtronic Minimed 640G with Smartguard (MM640G) in adult patients with type 1 Diabetes mellitus.
All clinical variables are gathered from three EMR softwares and two sensor-augmented pumps sotwares.
Data analysis is conducted using SPSS (Chicago, IL) statistics software. Results are presented as mean ± SD values or percentages. A Kruskal-Wallis or a Friedman test were used for the analysis of differences. Comparisons between proportions were analyzed using a chi-squared test. A "P" value \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The protocol was approved by the reference Castilla-La Mancha Public Health Institute Ethic Committee. All participants provided written informed consent.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 23
- Type 1 diabetes
- Treated with TTSX2 or MM640.
- Other kind of diabetes.
- Serious mental disease.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description SAP with LGS TTSX2 Type 1 diabetes adults patients treated with sensor-augmented insulin pump with low glucose predictive suspension function SAP with LGS MM640G Type 1 diabetes adults patients treated with sensor-augmented insulin pump with low glucose predictive suspension function
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method TIR during the procedure time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL, 3.9-10 mmol/L) of the interstitial glucose
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method GMI during the procedure Glucose management index
MAGE during the procedure Mean amplitude glucose excursions
Hypoglycemia perception 2 during the procedure Hypoglycemia unawareness (Gold questionnary scores), single question, score from 0 to 5, worse score is five points.
TBR during the procedure time below range (TBR, \<70 mg/dL, \<3.9 mmol/L) of the interstitial glucose
HbA1C during the procedure Glycate haemoglobina A1C
DQOL during the procedure Diabetes quality of life (EsDQOL questionnary score), 43 questions, each question with a score from 1 to 5, worse score is five points.
TAR during the procedure time above range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL, 3.9-10 mmol/L) of the interstitial glucose
%CV 14 days Coefficient of variation percentage of the intersticial glucose
Hypoglycemia perception 1 during the procedure Hypoglycemia unawareness (Clarke questionnary score), 8 questions, each one score "R" or "not R", more "R" means worse score.
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria University Hospital
🇪🇸Tenerife, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
Obispo Rafael Torija, St.
🇪🇸Ciudad Real, Spain
Badajoz University Hospital
🇪🇸Badajoz, Spain