Comparison of pulpectomy with CEM cement pulpotomy in primary molars
Phase 4
- Conditions
- inflamed radicular pulp of primary molars which is the indication for pulpectomy treatment.PulpitisK04.0
- Registration Number
- IRCT20201226049838N1
- Lead Sponsor
- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Inclusion Criteria
Pediatric patients aged 4-9 years
Primary molars with vital pulps and deep carious lesions
Presence of inflamed radicular pulp after pulp amputation (sever bleeding may be present and can be controlled up to 10 min)
Tenderness to percussion or spontaneous pain may be present
Exclusion Criteria
Evidence of Pulp necrosis
Pathologic internal or external root resorption
Pathologic mobility
Pulp canal obliteration
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical success rate of CEM cement pulpotomy and Metapex pulpectomy. Timepoint: 6, 12 months. Method of measurement: spontaneous pain, Tenderness to percussion and palpation, gingival swelling, presence of sinus tract/fistula, pathologic mobility.;Radiographic success rate of CEM cement pulpotomy and Metapex pulpectomy. Timepoint: 6, 12 months. Method of measurement: Internal root resorption, pathologic external root resorption, furcal/periapical radiolucencies, pulp canal obliteration, periodontal ligament widening, Pathologic involvement of succedaneous tooth.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method