MedPath

Ultrasound Guided Activated and Non Activated Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Versus Hydro Dissection by Steroids.

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Compare Steroids Versus PRP in Dissection of Median Nerve by Ultrasound
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Interventions
Drug: platelet rich plasma
Registration Number
NCT06249503
Lead Sponsor
Ain Shams University
Brief Summary

PRP represents a promising, nonsurgical option for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with improvement in symptoms compared to placebo, conservative treatment, and local corticosteroid injections at 3-months postintervention. However, the lack of significant long-term results in pain and function demands the presence of future studies to further determine the long-term effect on a large group of homogeneous patients. More over to determine the clinical indications, effect on differing CTS severities, and the effects of preparation, concentration of the platelets and methods of activation of PRP

Detailed Description

1. The patients are blinded to the type of drug and the researchers are blinded to the randomization. Randomization will be done using a research randomization program (http://www.randomizer.org)

2. Patients will be randomly divided into three groups; each consists of 30 patients. Group 1 will include patients subjected to ultrasound guided activated PRP injection, group 2 will include patients subjected to ultrasound guided non-activated PRP injection, and group 3 patients will be subjected to ultrasound guided hydro dissection using a combination of steroid (Triamcinolone 40mg), LA (local anesthesia) and dextrose.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with mild to moderate idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome with clinical manifestations, diagnosed by electrophysiological study and ultrasound. CTS grading will be performed on basis of an electrophysiological study following Stevens classification (Stevens; 1997).

    • Early CTS: abnormal findings only in both comparative studies (≥0.5ms difference in peak latency)
    • Mild CTS: abnormal median sensory study (peak latency ≥3.5ms)
    • Moderate CTS: abnormal median sensory study and prolonged median distal motor latency (onset latency ≥4.5ms)
    • Sever CTS: any of the above mentioned abnormalities together with the evidence of axonal loss either by absent median sensory response, low amplitude, or absent median motor response (<2µV)
Exclusion Criteria
  • • Patients suffering from diabetes, hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, , cervical radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, brachial plexopathy, traumatic nerve injury, thoracic outlet syndrome, coagulopathy

    • Pregnancy
    • Previous corticosteroid injection into the carpal tunnel.
    • Previous carpal tunnel decompressive surgery.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Activated PRPplatelet rich plasmaPRP is activated by adding 200μl of 0.025 calcium chloride and used in hydrodissection.
Non-Activated PRPplatelet rich plasmaPRP is used directly in hydrodissection.
Steroid groupplatelet rich plasmaHydro dissection using a combination of steroid (Triamcinolone 40mg), local anesthetics and dextrose.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain visual analogue scale2 weeks,1,3 and 6 months

Ruler with number on it and the scale by measuring the distance in millimeter from 0 to 10 where is 0 means no pain and 10 means sever disabling pain and in between the different degrees of pain

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire2 weeks, 1,3 and 6 months

questionnaire formed of 11 questions each question give grading from 1 to 5 where is 1 means normal and 5 means sever pain and in between different grades

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ain Shams University Hospitals

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath