MedPath

Fibered Platinum Coils vs Vascular Plugs in Pelvic Varices Embolization for the Treatment of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
Interventions
Device: Fibered platinum coils
Device: Vascular plugs
Registration Number
NCT02796092
Lead Sponsor
Group of Research in Minimally Invasive Techniques
Brief Summary

This prospective randomized study compares the safety and efficacy of two different embolizing agents for the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome: fibered platinum coils and vascular plugs.

Detailed Description

This prospective randomized study compares the safety and efficacy of two embolizing agents for the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome: fibered platinum coils (Nester coils; Cook Medical) and vascular plugs (Amplatzer vascular plugs II; St. Jude Medical).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Signed informed consent
  • Presence of chronic abdominal or pelvic pain for more than 6 months
  • >6 mm pelvic venous caliber measured by transvaginal US
  • Presence of venous reflux OR presence of communicating veins assessed by transvaginal Doppler US
Exclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosed gynecological or pelvic pathology: endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, postoperative adhesions, adenomyosis or leiomyoma
  • Glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min
  • History of contrast reaction
  • Patients not able to be followed up for at least one year

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Fibered platinum coilsFibered platinum coilsEmbolization of the pelvic veins with platinum fibered coils (Nester. Cook Europe, Bjaeverskov, Denmark)
Vascular plugsVascular plugsEmbolization of the pelvic veins with vascular plugs (Amplatzer Vascular Plugs II. St. Jude Medical. St. Paul, MN, USA)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Pain Scale12 months

Reduction of 4 points or more between subjective pain assessed by VAS prior to procedure (-4, -5,- 6, -7,-8,-9).

VAS= visual analogue scale: it is a subjective pain scale, scored from 1 to 10 (1 no pain; 10 worst pain possible)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cost of TreatmentIntraoperative

Cost of the differential devices used in each treatment procedure, assuming the same cost for the rest of the procedure, other material and hospital stay.

Procedure Radiation Dose (DAP)Intraoperative

DAP, dose area product of the intervention, (in mGy\*cm\^2), recorded by fluoroscopy equipment

Total Intervention DurationIntraoperative

Total time length of the procedure, from puncture to compression (in minutes)

Need for Re-embolization12 months

Scheduled re-embolization due to incomplete occlusion

Improvement of Urinary Urgency12 months

Disappearance or improvement of urinary urgency assessed by direct questioning before the procedure and 12 months after the procedure (YES/NO)

Satisfaction With the Procedure12 months

Overall satisfaction with the procedure via telephone survey (scaled from 0 to 9).

Patients answered just one question. Are you satisfied with the procedure? Being 0 = Completely unsatisfied, I regret having undergone a embolization procedure 9=Totally satisfied with the procedure, everything was perfect, I would recommend it to anyone with the same problem.

Fluoroscopy TimeIntraoperative

Total fluoroscopy time, recorded by the equipment (in minutes)

Procedure Radiation Dose (AK)Intraoperative

AK, total air kerma of the intervention (in mGy), recorded by fluoroscopy equipment

Complications12 months

Toral number of events related to the procedure in the follow-up (1 year)

Improvement of Dyspareunia12 months

Disappearance or improvement of dyspareunia assessed by direct questioning before the procedure and 12 months after the procedure (YES/NO)

Improvement of Dysmenorrhea12 months

Disappearance or improvement of dysmenorrhea assessed by direct questioning before the procedure and 12 months after the procedure (YES/NO)

Number of Devices Usedintraoperative

Number of coils and number of vascular plugs used in each procedure

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Lozano Blesa University Hospital

🇪🇸

Zaragoza, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath