Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02796092
NCT02796092
Completed
N/A

Fibered Platinum Coils vs Vascular Plugs in Pelvic Varices Embolization for the Treatment of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome

Group of Research in Minimally Invasive Techniques1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentFebruary 2014

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
Sponsor
Group of Research in Minimally Invasive Techniques
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Pain Scale
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This prospective randomized study compares the safety and efficacy of two different embolizing agents for the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome: fibered platinum coils and vascular plugs.

Detailed Description

This prospective randomized study compares the safety and efficacy of two embolizing agents for the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome: fibered platinum coils (Nester coils; Cook Medical) and vascular plugs (Amplatzer vascular plugs II; St. Jude Medical).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 2014
End Date
April 2016
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Female

Investigators

Sponsor
Group of Research in Minimally Invasive Techniques
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Signed informed consent
  • Presence of chronic abdominal or pelvic pain for more than 6 months
  • \>6 mm pelvic venous caliber measured by transvaginal US
  • Presence of venous reflux OR presence of communicating veins assessed by transvaginal Doppler US

Exclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosed gynecological or pelvic pathology: endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, postoperative adhesions, adenomyosis or leiomyoma
  • Glomerular filtration rate \<60 ml/min
  • History of contrast reaction
  • Patients not able to be followed up for at least one year

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Pain Scale

Time Frame: 12 months

Reduction of 4 points or more between subjective pain assessed by VAS prior to procedure (-4, -5,- 6, -7,-8,-9). VAS= visual analogue scale: it is a subjective pain scale, scored from 1 to 10 (1 no pain; 10 worst pain possible)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Cost of Treatment(Intraoperative)
  • Procedure Radiation Dose (DAP)(Intraoperative)
  • Total Intervention Duration(Intraoperative)
  • Need for Re-embolization(12 months)
  • Improvement of Urinary Urgency(12 months)
  • Satisfaction With the Procedure(12 months)
  • Fluoroscopy Time(Intraoperative)
  • Procedure Radiation Dose (AK)(Intraoperative)
  • Complications(12 months)
  • Improvement of Dyspareunia(12 months)
  • Improvement of Dysmenorrhea(12 months)
  • Number of Devices Used(intraoperative)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials