Evaluating Community Health Centers' Adoption of a New Global Capitation Payment
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 400,000
- 主要终点
- Internal services utilization
研究概览
简要总结
The investigators are conducting a prospective analysis of the Alternative Payment Methodology (APM) demonstration project sites. The investigators' goal is to conduct a cross project analysis of findings. The investigators propose to use mixed methods to study processes and outcomes associated with the APM natural experiment in payment reform. The investigators hypothesize that Community Health Centers (CHCs) participating in the APM demonstration project will redesign their workflows to better focus on patient and population health needs, resulting in reallocation of financial resources, lower overall costs, changes in utilization patterns, and improved quality.
详细描述
Led by the Oregon Primary Care Association, three community health center (CHC) organizations in Oregon developed an Alternative Payment Methodology (APM). Under this APM pilot participating CHCs will receive a prospective payment system (PPS) payment as a capitated equivalent in a per-member-per-month rate for all of their Medicaid patients. Oregon CHC organizations (several clinic sites) implemented Phase I of this demonstration project on March 1, 2013; Phase II A was implemented on July 1, 2014; Phase II B on October 1, 2014; and Phase III began July 1, 2015.
We are a prospective analysis of the APM project sites. We propose to use mixed methods to study processes and outcomes associated with the APM natural experiment in payment reform. We hypothesize that CHCs participating in the APM demonstration project will redesign their workflows to better focus on patient and population health needs, resulting in reallocation of financial resources, lower overall costs, changes in utilization patterns, and improved quality.
The study will include baseline qualitative data collection as clinics are transitioning to the APM methodology. We will conduct 2 site visits to each intervention clinic to observe practice changes that occurred post APM-implementation (first visit approximately 12-18 months post-APM implementation; second visit approximately 30-36 months post-APM implementation). We will also assemble and analyze of pre-post quantitative and qualitative datasets, and interpretation and dissemination of study findings.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Control
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 2 Years 至 64 Years(Child, Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Total clinic population:
- •established patients at intervention and control clinics aged 2-64
- •Medicaid Population:
- •Medicaid-enrolled patients at intervention and control clinics aged 2-64
排除标准
- •Total clinic population:
- •non-established patients at intervention and control clinics aged 2-64
- •Medicaid Population:
- •non-Medicaid-enrolled patients at intervention and control clinics aged 2-64
结局指标
主要结局
Internal services utilization
时间窗: ≤3 years pre-APM implementation and ≤3 years post
Number and type of internal services utilized including number and ratio of "traditional" face to face visits vs. "nontraditional" encounters and communication via phone, personal health record, and email
次要结局
- Medicaid expenditures(≤3 years pre-APM implementation and ≤3 years post)
- Quality care measures(≤3 years pre-APM implementation and ≤3 years post)
- External services utilization(≤3 years pre-APM implementation and ≤3 years post)
研究者
John Heintzman
Principal Investigator
Oregon Health and Science University
