A Trial of the Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibitor Palmitoylethanolamide in Bipolar Depression
- Conditions
- Bipolar Depression
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT06229977
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to o evaluate the antidepressant efficacy of the PEA in Bipolar Depression and the association between antidepressant response with endogenous cannabinoids and cytokine levels
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Structured Clinical Interview), Fifth Edition, (DSM5), with a score of ≥16 on the 17-item HAM-D
- currently in use of at least one FDA approved mood stabilizer with or without antidepressant
- medically and neurologically healthy on the basis of medical history, physical examination
- Cannabis misuse according to clinical judgement
- unstable medical condition or uncontrolled medical problem with known central nervous system (CNS) effects
- active DSM-5 substance use disorder in past three months (other than alcohol or nicotine use disorder)
- acute high suicidal risk
- in a manic episode
- current psychotic features or cognitive impairment that would preclude understanding of the consenting process or tests/examination
- pregnant or nursing women
- unstable medical conditions
- clinically significant abnormal laboratory tests based on complete blood count, liver and kidney function when available
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description PEA plus Treatment as Usual (TAU) Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) - PEA plus Treatment as Usual (TAU) Treatment as Usual (TAU) - Placebo plus Treatment as Usual (TAU) Placebo - Placebo plus Treatment as Usual (TAU) Treatment as Usual (TAU) -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in depression as assessed by the Hamilton Depression rating Scale (HAM-D) Baseline, 6 weeks follow up This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0-2 for a maximum score of 26 , a higher score indicating worse outcome
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of participants that show a response as assessed by the HAM-D scale from baseline to end of study (6 week follow up) Response rate is defined by ≥ 50 % reduction in depression score(HAM-D). This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0-2 for a maximum score of 26 , a higher score indicating worse outcome
Percentage of participants that show a remission of depressive symptoms as assessed by the HAM-D scale. from baseline to end of study (6 week follow up) Remission of depressive symptoms are defined by a score of ≤7 on the HAM-D. This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0-2 for a maximum score of 26 , a higher score indicating worse outcome
Number of participants that show early improvement as defined by >20% improvement in HAM-D depression score From baseline to week 2 visit This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0-2 for a maximum score of 26 , a higher score indicating worse outcome
Change in depression as assessed by the Montgomery Äsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Baseline, 6 weeks follow up This is a 10 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 -6 for a maximum score of 60, higher score indicating worse outcome
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States