MedPath

A Trial of the Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibitor Palmitoylethanolamide in Bipolar Depression

Phase 2
Recruiting
Conditions
Bipolar Depression
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT06229977
Lead Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to o evaluate the antidepressant efficacy of the PEA in Bipolar Depression and the association between antidepressant response with endogenous cannabinoids and cytokine levels

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Structured Clinical Interview), Fifth Edition, (DSM5), with a score of ≥16 on the 17-item HAM-D
  • currently in use of at least one FDA approved mood stabilizer with or without antidepressant
  • medically and neurologically healthy on the basis of medical history, physical examination
Exclusion Criteria
  • Cannabis misuse according to clinical judgement
  • unstable medical condition or uncontrolled medical problem with known central nervous system (CNS) effects
  • active DSM-5 substance use disorder in past three months (other than alcohol or nicotine use disorder)
  • acute high suicidal risk
  • in a manic episode
  • current psychotic features or cognitive impairment that would preclude understanding of the consenting process or tests/examination
  • pregnant or nursing women
  • unstable medical conditions
  • clinically significant abnormal laboratory tests based on complete blood count, liver and kidney function when available

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PEA plus Treatment as Usual (TAU)Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA)-
PEA plus Treatment as Usual (TAU)Treatment as Usual (TAU)-
Placebo plus Treatment as Usual (TAU)Placebo-
Placebo plus Treatment as Usual (TAU)Treatment as Usual (TAU)-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in depression as assessed by the Hamilton Depression rating Scale (HAM-D)Baseline, 6 weeks follow up

This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0-2 for a maximum score of 26 , a higher score indicating worse outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of participants that show a response as assessed by the HAM-D scalefrom baseline to end of study (6 week follow up)

Response rate is defined by ≥ 50 % reduction in depression score(HAM-D). This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0-2 for a maximum score of 26 , a higher score indicating worse outcome

Percentage of participants that show a remission of depressive symptoms as assessed by the HAM-D scale.from baseline to end of study (6 week follow up)

Remission of depressive symptoms are defined by a score of ≤7 on the HAM-D. This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0-2 for a maximum score of 26 , a higher score indicating worse outcome

Number of participants that show early improvement as defined by >20% improvement in HAM-D depression scoreFrom baseline to week 2 visit

This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0-2 for a maximum score of 26 , a higher score indicating worse outcome

Change in depression as assessed by the Montgomery Äsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Baseline, 6 weeks follow up

This is a 10 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 -6 for a maximum score of 60, higher score indicating worse outcome

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath