COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF HAND ARM BIMANUAL INTENSIVE TRAINING (HABIT) AND PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION (PNF) PATTERNS ON UPPER EXTREMITY DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH SUBACUTE STROKE
- Conditions
- Stroke.Subacute stroke169.4
- Registration Number
- IRCT20230526058301N1
- Lead Sponsor
- The University of Faisalabad
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 46
Stroke patient clinically diagnosed or with scan of CT computed tomography or MRI magnetic resonance imaging
Sub-acute stroke patients
Age 35–60?years
Patient with GCS score >8 and vitally stable
On Mini-Mental State Exam score must be >24 and having no severe cognitive problems
Patients suffered from first time stroke and able to give informed consent
Patients with severe cardiopulmonary complications
Any intracranial implant
Patient with pacemaker
Any kind of cranial defect
Patients with worsening condition that causes difficulties for physiotherapy treatment
All the medical conditions except stroke that limited the use of upper limb
Patients with epilepsy
Patients having previous history of stroke on same side that diminish upper extremity function
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Spasticity. Timepoint: At baseline, after second week of intervention, after fourth week of intervention, after sixth week of intervention and after eight week of intervention. Method of measurement: Modified Ashworth Scale.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Motor Function of upper limb. Timepoint: At baseline, after second week of intervention, after fourth week of intervention, after sixth week of intervention and after eight week of intervention. Method of measurement: Fugl-Meyer assessment scale for Upper Extremity.;Activities of daily living and motor function of upper limb. Timepoint: At baseline, after second week of intervention, after fourth week of intervention, after sixth week of intervention and after eight week of intervention. Method of measurement: Motor activity log-28 scores.