MedPath

Reattachment of the SPR Versus the Bone Block Procedure for Recurrent Peroneal Tendon Dislocation

Completed
Conditions
Recurrent Peroneal Tendon Dislocation
Interventions
Procedure: bone block procedure
Procedure: Reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum
Registration Number
NCT04955665
Lead Sponsor
Peking University Third Hospital
Brief Summary

Clinical outcomes between reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum (SPR) and the bone block procedure were compared in this study to elucidate which procedure was safer and more effective.

Detailed Description

From 2012 to 2016, 25 patients with recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation underwent the bone block procedure(group A), and another 22 patients underwent reattachment of the SPR (group B). American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Ankle Activity Score (AAS), time to return to sports activity, rate of return to sports level, range of motion (ROM) of the ankle, rate of recurrence, and overall patient satisfaction were collected to evaluate outcomes between the two groups.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
47
Inclusion Criteria
  • a traumatic recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation requiring surgery
  • a lack of response to at least 3 months of conservative treatment
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • the presence of an acute peroneal tendon dislocation
  • a concomitant anterior talofibular ligament rupture
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Bone block procedurebone block procedurepatients with recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation underwent the bone block procedure
Reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculumReattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculumpatients with recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation underwent reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
AOFAS2 years after operation

The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score combines subjective scores of pain and function provided by the patient with objective scores based on the surgeon's physical examination of the patient (to assess sagittal motion, hindfoot motion, ankle-hindfoot stability and alignment of the ankle-hindfoot). The scale includes nine items that can be divided into three subscales (pain, function and alignment). The minimum and maximum values of AOFAS are 100 and 0, respectively. And higher scores mean a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
VAS2 years after operation

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is designed to present to the respondent a rating scale with minimum constraints. Respondents mark the location on the 10-centimeter line corresponding to the amount of pain they experienced. This gives them the greatest freedom to choose their pain's exact intensity. It also gives the maximum opportunity for each respondent to express a personal response style. The minimum and maximum values of VAS are 10 and 0, respectively. And higher scores mean a worse outcome.

time to return to sports activityup to 2 years

time to return to sports activity after surgery at each group

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath