Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00085202
NCT00085202CompletedPhase 3

Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Medulloblastoma, Supratentorial Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor, or Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital9 sites in 3 countries416 target enrollmentStarted: August 2003Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Enrollment
416
Locations
9
Primary Endpoint
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive Tumors

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as vincristine, cisplatin, and cyclophosphamide, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining radiation therapy with chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. Autologous stem cell transplant may be able to replace blood-forming cells that were destroyed by chemotherapy or radiation therapy. It is not yet known which radiation therapy regimen combined with chemotherapy and donor stem cell transplant is more effective in treating medulloblastoma, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor, or atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor.

This phase III trial is studying two different regimens of radiation therapy when given together with chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant to see how well they work in treating patients with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor, or atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

  • To assess the relationship between ERBB2 protein expression in tumors and progression-free survival probability for patients with medulloblastoma.
  • To estimate the frequency of mutations associated with SHH and WNT tumors (as defined by gene expression profiling) via targeted sequencing performed in an independent cohort of WNT and SHH tumors (also defined by gene expression profiling).

Detailed Description

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  • To compare the effects of a computer-based training system specifically targeting language, reading, and learning skills (Fast ForWord, Scientific Learning Corporation) with the current standard of care on reading decoding skills as measured by individual academic testing.
  • To monitor for treatment failure in the posterior fossa of patients whose tumor bed receives a reduced volume of radiation.
  • To correlate radiation dosimetry of target and normal tissues with rate and patterns of failure and longitudinal measures of audiometric, endocrine and cognitive effects.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

  • To estimate the change in neuropsychological performance from the neuropsychology assessment battery (intellect, academic achievement and cognitive ability) and examine the relationship of these changes to risk group, age at diagnosis, and parent measures.
  • To evaluate the differences between neurotoxicity in the average-risk patient group with that in the high-risk group through qMRI, and fMRI.
  • To develop or refine novel models relating impact of medulloblastoma therapy on neurocognitive performance to quantitative and functional neuroimaging measures.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease risk (high-risk disease vs average-risk disease).

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
3 Years to 21 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Stratum 1 (high-risk group)

Experimental

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6 weeks. Six weeks after the completion of radiotherapy, patients receive high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) and filgrastim (G-CSF) with post-transplantation vincristine. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT repeat every 4 weeks for 3 additional courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

Intervention: vincristine (Drug)

Stratum 1 (high-risk group)

Experimental

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6 weeks. Six weeks after the completion of radiotherapy, patients receive high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) and filgrastim (G-CSF) with post-transplantation vincristine. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT repeat every 4 weeks for 3 additional courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

Intervention: filgrastim (Biological)

Stratum 1 (high-risk group)

Experimental

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6 weeks. Six weeks after the completion of radiotherapy, patients receive high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) and filgrastim (G-CSF) with post-transplantation vincristine. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT repeat every 4 weeks for 3 additional courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

Intervention: cisplatin (Drug)

Stratum 1 (high-risk group)

Experimental

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6 weeks. Six weeks after the completion of radiotherapy, patients receive high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) and filgrastim (G-CSF) with post-transplantation vincristine. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT repeat every 4 weeks for 3 additional courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

Intervention: cyclophosphamide (Drug)

Stratum 1 (high-risk group)

Experimental

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6 weeks. Six weeks after the completion of radiotherapy, patients receive high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) and filgrastim (G-CSF) with post-transplantation vincristine. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT repeat every 4 weeks for 3 additional courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

Intervention: autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Procedure)

Stratum 1 (high-risk group)

Experimental

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 6 weeks. Six weeks after the completion of radiotherapy, patients receive high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) and filgrastim (G-CSF) with post-transplantation vincristine. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT repeat every 4 weeks for 3 additional courses in the absence of unacceptable toxicity.

Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

Intervention: radiation therapy (Radiation)

Stratum 2 (average-risk group)

Experimental

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy as in stratum 1, but at a lower dose. Patients receive high-dose chemotherapy, autologous SCT, G-CSF, and post-transplantation vincristine as in stratum 1.

Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

Intervention: filgrastim (Biological)

Stratum 2 (average-risk group)

Experimental

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy as in stratum 1, but at a lower dose. Patients receive high-dose chemotherapy, autologous SCT, G-CSF, and post-transplantation vincristine as in stratum 1.

Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

Intervention: cisplatin (Drug)

Stratum 2 (average-risk group)

Experimental

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy as in stratum 1, but at a lower dose. Patients receive high-dose chemotherapy, autologous SCT, G-CSF, and post-transplantation vincristine as in stratum 1.

Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

Intervention: cyclophosphamide (Drug)

Stratum 2 (average-risk group)

Experimental

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy as in stratum 1, but at a lower dose. Patients receive high-dose chemotherapy, autologous SCT, G-CSF, and post-transplantation vincristine as in stratum 1.

Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

Intervention: vincristine (Drug)

Stratum 2 (average-risk group)

Experimental

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy as in stratum 1, but at a lower dose. Patients receive high-dose chemotherapy, autologous SCT, G-CSF, and post-transplantation vincristine as in stratum 1.

Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

Intervention: autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Procedure)

Stratum 2 (average-risk group)

Experimental

Patients undergo craniospinal radiotherapy as in stratum 1, but at a lower dose. Patients receive high-dose chemotherapy, autologous SCT, G-CSF, and post-transplantation vincristine as in stratum 1.

Interventions: vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, filgrastim, radiation therapy

Intervention: radiation therapy (Radiation)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in ERBB2-Negative Tumors Compared to ERBB2-Positive Tumors

Time Frame: 2 years after tumor cell analysis in 122 participants

The relationship between ERBB2 protein expression in tumors and progression-free survival was assessed in 122 participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma and with ERBB2 protein assessments. If the ERBB2 value was greater than zero, the ERBB2 was defined as positive for the participant. If the ERBB2 value was zero, the ERBB2 was defined as negative. Progression-free survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of disease progression/relapse, the date of death, or the date of last contact. The log-rank test was used to compare the PFS distributions of ERBB2 groups.

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Compared Between ERBB2 Assessment and Risk Group.

Time Frame: 2 years after tumor cell analysis in 122 participants

122 participants with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma were grouped by ERBB2 positive/negative assessment and risk group into 4 groups. Progression-free survival was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of disease progression/relapse, the date of death, or the date of last contact. The log-rank test was used to compare the PFS distributions of ERBB2 groups.

Frequency of Mutations Associated With SHH and WNT Tumors

Time Frame: within 3.5 years following completion of accrual

The frequency of mutations for the main genes associated with SHH and WNT tumors identified via targeted sequencing based on formalin fixed paraffin embedded material is provided.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Reading Decoding Composite Scores in the Intervention and Standard of Care Groups(5 years postdiagnosis)
  • Number of Average Risk Patients Whose Treatment Failure Included the Posterior Fossa(Annually for 6 years post irradiation)
  • Associative Memory for Two Risk Group at Enrollment(At enrollment)
  • Perceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment(At 5 years after enrollment)
  • Associative Memory for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment(At 5 years after enrollment)
  • Processing Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment(At enrollment)
  • Processing Speed for Two Risk Group at 5 Years After Enrollment(At 5 years after enrollment)
  • Perceptual Speed for Two Risk Group at Enrollment(At enrollment)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (9)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials